BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “TDS”+ Section 196Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai10Delhi7Bangalore4Pune2Jabalpur2Kolkata2Hyderabad1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 92C6Section 12A4Section 2014Section 10A4Deduction4Addition to Income3Section 115J2Section 143(3)2Section 234B2TDS2

M/S RAMBUS CHIP TECHNOLOGIES (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, BANGALORE

In the result, the revenue’s appeal is dismissed and assessee’s appeal is partly allowed

ITA 23/BANG/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Jul 2015AY 2009-10

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri Jason P.Boaz

For Appellant: Shri G.C.Srivastava, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr.P.K.Srihari, Addl.CIT(DR)
Section 10ASection 115JSection 143(3)Section 234BSection 92C

196A, Section 196B, Section 196C and Section 196D shall pay within the prescribed time, the sum so deducted to the credit of the Central Government or as the Board directs. 201(1). If any such person and in the cases referred to in Section 194, the principal officer and the company of which he is the principal officer does

Transfer Pricing2
Depreciation2

DCIT, BANGALORE vs. M/S RAMBUS CHIP TECHNOLOGIES (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,, BANGALORE

In the result, the revenue’s appeal is dismissed and assessee’s appeal is partly allowed

ITA 61/BANG/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Jul 2015AY 2009-10

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri Jason P.Boaz

For Appellant: Shri G.C.Srivastava, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr.P.K.Srihari, Addl.CIT(DR)
Section 10ASection 115JSection 143(3)Section 234BSection 92C

196A, Section 196B, Section 196C and Section 196D shall pay within the prescribed time, the sum so deducted to the credit of the Central Government or as the Board directs. 201(1). If any such person and in the cases referred to in Section 194, the principal officer and the company of which he is the principal officer does

BSR INFRATECH INDIA LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 697/BANG/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Oct 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year: 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Madhusudhan, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Praveen Karanth, D.R
Section 199Section 234ASection 270ASection 43Section 43C

196A, the assessee shall not be called upon to pay the tax himself to the extent to which tax has been deducted from that income". 8.6 He submitted that the plain reading of the section makes it clear that where tax is deductible and the same has already been deducted, the deductee shall not be called

CANARA BANK,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS), BANGALORE

In the result, these appeals filed by the assessees for A

ITA 1476/BANG/2014[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore12 Aug 2015AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Jason P. Boaz

For Appellant: Shri Balaram R Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr.P.K. Srihari, Addl. CIT (D.R.)
Section 12ASection 194ASection 196ASection 197(1)Section 2(15)Section 201Section 201(1)

TDS) under Section 194A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act') in the belief that it was not liable to deduct tax since KIADB was exempt from tax, being registered under Section 12A of the Act. On examination, the authorities below observed that while placing the deposits with the assesses, KIADB had furnished certificates under Section