BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

106 results for “TDS”+ Section 194Hclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai337Delhi303Bangalore106Kolkata105Chennai79Jaipur40Indore39Ahmedabad39Hyderabad38Karnataka27Cuttack25Pune22Rajkot21Chandigarh20Amritsar10Cochin9Surat7Patna7Raipur6Visakhapatnam6Lucknow5Telangana4Jabalpur3SC3Calcutta3Guwahati3Allahabad3Nagpur3Jodhpur2Kerala2Ranchi2Panaji1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 40115Section 20172Section 143(3)70Deduction70Disallowance62Section 201(1)56Section 194H55TDS54Section 36(1)(viia)47Addition to Income

ACIT, BANGALORE vs. M/S IDEA CELLUAR LTD.,, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed in part and the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 758/BANG/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore06 Nov 2015AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Shri Ronak G Doshi, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar Agarwala, JCIT(DR)
Section 133ASection 194HSection 194JSection 201(1)

TDS Officer under section 201(1)/201(1A) of the Act by treating "discount" offered by the Appellant to the Distributors as "commission" and thereby treating the Appellant as an "assessee in default" under section 201(1) r. w. s. 194H

Showing 1–20 of 106 · Page 1 of 6

46
Section 194C33
Section 36(1)(vii)33

M/S IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. ACIT, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed in part and the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 651/BANG/2014[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore06 Nov 2015AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Shri Ronak G Doshi, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar Agarwala, JCIT(DR)
Section 133ASection 194HSection 194JSection 201(1)

TDS Officer under section 201(1)/201(1A) of the Act by treating "discount" offered by the Appellant to the Distributors as "commission" and thereby treating the Appellant as an "assessee in default" under section 201(1) r. w. s. 194H

M/S IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. ACIT, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed in part and the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 648/BANG/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore06 Nov 2015AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Shri Ronak G Doshi, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar Agarwala, JCIT(DR)
Section 133ASection 194HSection 194JSection 201(1)

TDS Officer under section 201(1)/201(1A) of the Act by treating "discount" offered by the Appellant to the Distributors as "commission" and thereby treating the Appellant as an "assessee in default" under section 201(1) r. w. s. 194H

M/S. SEIKO WATCH INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-6(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 362/BANG/2023[AY 2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore01 Aug 2023

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuassessment Year : 2018-19 M/S. Seiko Watch India Pvt. Ltd., The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, #874, Ground Floor Temple Vista, Circle – 6(1)(1), Shri Krishna Temple Road, Vs. Bengaluru. Indiranagar I Stage, Bengaluru – 560 038. Pan : Aakcs 6484 K Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. Nithin Surana, Ca Revenue By : Shri. D. K. Mishra, Cit(Dr), Itat, Bengaluru. Date Of Hearing : 01.08.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 01.08.2023

For Appellant: Shri. Nithin Surana, CAFor Respondent: Shri. D. K. Mishra, CIT(DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 143(3)Section 194HSection 263Section 40

section 194H of the Act, and non-deduction of TDS would entail the expenditure to be disallowed under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. To determine

M/S. DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PRIVATE LIMITED,,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE

In the result, appealsof the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 622/BANG/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore19 Apr 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadavand Shri. Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Shri. Sunil Jain, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Vandana Sagar
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 153ASection 194HSection 32Section 40

TDS on collection charges as provided under section 194H of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter called ITA Nos.581, 596, 622, 636/Bang/2017

M/S DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE

In the result, appealsof the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 581/BANG/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore19 Apr 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadavand Shri. Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Shri. Sunil Jain, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Vandana Sagar
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 153ASection 194HSection 32Section 40

TDS on collection charges as provided under section 194H of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter called ITA Nos.581, 596, 622, 636/Bang/2017

M/S. DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PRIVATE LIMITED,,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE

In the result, appealsof the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 636/BANG/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore19 Apr 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadavand Shri. Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Shri. Sunil Jain, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Vandana Sagar
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 153ASection 194HSection 32Section 40

TDS on collection charges as provided under section 194H of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter called ITA Nos.581, 596, 622, 636/Bang/2017

M/S. DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PRIVATE LIMITED,,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE

In the result, appealsof the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 596/BANG/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore19 Apr 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadavand Shri. Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Shri. Sunil Jain, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Vandana Sagar
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 153ASection 194HSection 32Section 40

TDS on collection charges as provided under section 194H of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter called ITA Nos.581, 596, 622, 636/Bang/2017

M/S.METROPOLITAN MEDIA COMPANY LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, HUBLI

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1679/BANG/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Jul 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri S. Sundar Raman, CA(Written submissions)For Respondent: Shri Pradeep Kumar, CIT (D.R)
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 194CSection 40

TDS under section 194H. The Department, on the other hand, has taken the stand in some cases that since the advertising

THE KARUR VYSYA BANK LTD,BELLARY vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS CIRCLE, HUBLI-DHARWAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2886/BANG/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore01 Oct 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri B.R Baskaran & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year: 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri Ananthan, C.AFor Respondent: Shri R.N Siddappapji, Addl. CIT (DR)
Section 12ASection 133ASection 194ASection 197ASection 201Section 201(1)

TDS) Vijayawada vs. M/s Vijaya Bank, Kothagudem under similar facts and circumstances has decided the issue vide para7 which is reproduced below. 7. We have heard the submissions of the parties, perused the orders of the revenue authorities as well as other materials on record. It is the claim of the department that the assessee has not been able

ROBERT BOSCH ENGINEERING AND BUSINESS SOLUTIONS PRIAVTE LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) /OSD LTU , BANGALORE

In the result, both the appeals filed by assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1690/BANG/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore31 Jan 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Respondent: Shri Percy Padiwala, Sr
Section 201Section 201(1)Section 40

194H, 1941, 194J — relevant Sections under which TDS was required to be deducted by the assessee. These factors necessarily requires

ROBERT BOSCH ENGINEERING AND BUSINESS SOLUTIONS PVT LTD ,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) /OSD , BANGALORE

In the result, both the appeals filed by assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1689/BANG/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore31 Jan 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Respondent: Shri Percy Padiwala, Sr
Section 201Section 201(1)Section 40

194H, 1941, 194J — relevant Sections under which TDS was required to be deducted by the assessee. These factors necessarily requires

DELL INTERNATIONAL SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. ITO, BANGALORE

In the result the appeals filed by assessee and revenue for A

ITA 1151/BANG/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Mar 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

Section 201

194H, 1941, 194J — relevant Sections under which TDS was required to be deducted by the assessee. These factors necessarily requires

DELL INDIA P LTD,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS), LTU, BANGALORE

In the result the appeals filed by assessee and revenue for A

ITA 1644/BANG/2014[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Mar 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

Section 201

194H, 1941, 194J — relevant Sections under which TDS was required to be deducted by the assessee. These factors necessarily requires

INCOME TAX OFFICER, BANGALORE vs. M/S.DELL INDIA PVT.LTD.,, BANGALORE

In the result the appeals filed by assessee and revenue for A

ITA 2035/BANG/2016[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Mar 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

Section 201

194H, 1941, 194J — relevant Sections under which TDS was required to be deducted by the assessee. These factors necessarily requires

M/S DELL INTERNATIONAL SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD ,BANGALORE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LTPU , BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2846/BANG/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore07 Aug 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Smt. Tanmayee Rajkumar, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, D.R
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(5)Section 92C(3)

194H, 1941, 194J — relevant Sections under which TDS was required to be deducted by the assessee. These factors necessarily requires

ITO, BANGALORE vs. M/S CONFIDENT PROJECTS (INDIA) LIMITED, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 183/BANG/2014[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 May 2016AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Inturi Rama Raoincome-Tax Officer (Tds), Ward 16(1), Bangalore. … Appellant Vs. M/S.Confident Projects (India) Ltd. No.574, ‘Park House’, 80 Feet Road, 8Th Block, Koramangala, Bangalore. … Respondent Pan:Aaccc7506L

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Kumar Agarwala, JCIT(DR)For Respondent: Ms. Puja Kothari, CA
Section 133ASection 194CSection 201(1)

TDS under section 194H. The Department, on the other hand, has taken the stand in some cases that since the advertising

THE URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,,SHIMOGA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, SHIMOGA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1664/BANG/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore10 Nov 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Jason P Boazassessment Year : 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri.Sandeep, CAFor Respondent: Shri. B. R. Ramesh, JCIT
Section 192Section 194HSection 40

TDS under section 194H of the Act. In the light of these legal positions, we find no merit in the order

M/S. KNOWLEDGE HUT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-4(3)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 466/BANG/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore21 Sept 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Ms. Madhumita Royassessment Year : 2018-19 M/S. Knowledge Hut The Deputy Solutions Pvt. Ltd., Commissioner No. 10, 14Th Main Road, Of Income Tax, Hosur Sarjapura Road, Circle - 4(3)(1), Bangalore – 560 102. Vs. Bangalore. Pan: Aaecc4762E Appellant Respondent & Assessment Year : 2018-19 M/S. Knowledge Hut The Deputy Solutions Pvt. Ltd., Commissioner No. 10, 14Th Main Road, Of Income Tax, Hosur Sarjapura Road, Nfac, Bangalore – 560 102. Delhi. Vs. Pan: Aaecc4762E Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, Ca Revenue By : Shri Nischal .B, Addl. Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 13-09-2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 21-09-2023

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Shri Nischal .B, Addl. CIT
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 43B

section 201(1) of the Act and failed the mandatory requirement to deduct TDS on this payment. The Ld.CIT(A) therefore, upheld the disallowance made by the Ld.AO. 13. At the time of hearing the instant appeals, the Ld.Counsel appearing for the assessee submitted before us that the issue may be remitted to the file of Ld.AO for verification

M/S. KNOWLEDGE HUT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, NFAC, DELHI, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 281/BANG/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore21 Sept 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Ms. Madhumita Royassessment Year : 2018-19 M/S. Knowledge Hut The Deputy Solutions Pvt. Ltd., Commissioner No. 10, 14Th Main Road, Of Income Tax, Hosur Sarjapura Road, Circle - 4(3)(1), Bangalore – 560 102. Vs. Bangalore. Pan: Aaecc4762E Appellant Respondent & Assessment Year : 2018-19 M/S. Knowledge Hut The Deputy Solutions Pvt. Ltd., Commissioner No. 10, 14Th Main Road, Of Income Tax, Hosur Sarjapura Road, Nfac, Bangalore – 560 102. Delhi. Vs. Pan: Aaecc4762E Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, Ca Revenue By : Shri Nischal .B, Addl. Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 13-09-2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 21-09-2023

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Shri Nischal .B, Addl. CIT
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 43B

section 201(1) of the Act and failed the mandatory requirement to deduct TDS on this payment. The Ld.CIT(A) therefore, upheld the disallowance made by the Ld.AO. 13. At the time of hearing the instant appeals, the Ld.Counsel appearing for the assessee submitted before us that the issue may be remitted to the file of Ld.AO for verification