BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

68 results for “TDS”+ Section 194A(3)(f)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai202Chandigarh96Delhi84Bangalore68Chennai41Kolkata30Jaipur25Cuttack22Hyderabad18Ahmedabad15Karnataka11Panaji10Amritsar10Cochin7Dehradun7Visakhapatnam6Pune6SC5Telangana4Ranchi3Lucknow2J&K2Rajkot1Guwahati1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 201(1)65TDS54Section 20128Deduction27Section 194A25Addition to Income22Section 32(1)(ii)20Section 115J20Section 10(5)18Disallowance

THE RADDI SAHAKARA BANK NIYAMITHA,DHARWAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), HUBBALLI

In the result, the impugned order could not be faulted with

ITA 538/BANG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore21 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Ms. Madhumita Royassessment Year : 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Parthasarthi and Smt. Sheetal, AdvocatesFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, CIT (DR)
Section 143(3)Section 40A

TDS under section 194A. 3. A question has also been raised as to whether normal members, associate members and sympathizer members are also covered by the exemption under section 194A(3)(v). It is hereby clarified that the exemption is available only to such members who have joined in application for the registration of the cooperative society and those

INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS), HUBLI vs. GENERAL MANAGAR,, HUBLI

Showing 1–20 of 68 · Page 1 of 4

16
Section 3715
Section 143(3)15

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue as well as the Cross-objection of the Assessee are dismissed

ITA 1192/BANG/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 Mar 2015AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri. N. V. Vasudevan & Shri. Jason P. Boazi.T.A No.1191 To 1194/Bang/2014 (Assessment Year : 2009-10 To 2012-13) The Income Tax Officer (Tds) 3Rd Floor, Cr Bldg.Annexe, Navanagar, Hubli-580 025 .. Appellant Vs. The Hubli Urban Co-Operative Bank Ltd. Gf, Urban Bank Building, 1 Sir Siddappa Kambli Road, Hubli 580 020 .. Respondent Pan : Aaaah0120P C.O.Nos. 25 To 28/Bang/2015 In I.T.A No.1191 To 1194/Bang/2014 (Assessment Year : 2009-10 To 2012-13) The Hubli Urban Co-Operative Bank Ltd. Gf, Urban Bank Building, 1 Sir Siddappa Kambli Road, Hubli 580 020 .. Cross-Objector Pan : Aaaah0120P Vs. The Income Tax Officer (Tds) 3Rd Floor, Cr Bldg.Annexe, Navanagar, Hubli-580 025 .. Respondent Assessee By : Shri. G.V.Desai, Ca 1

For Appellant: Shri. G.V.Desai, CAFor Respondent: Dr.P.K.Srihari, Addl.CIT
Section 194Section 194ASection 194A(1)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 51

TDS under section 194A. 3. A question has also been raised as to whether normal members, associate members and sympathizer members are also covered by the exemption under section 194A(3)(v). It is hereby clarified that the exemption is available only to such members who have joined in application for the registration of the co-operative society and those

M/S THE RADDI SAHAKARA BANK NIYAMITHA,DHARWAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,, HUBLI

In the result, the appeals by the assessee are allowed, while the stay petitions are dismissed

ITA 368/BANG/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore10 Jul 2015AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P. Boaz

For Appellant: Mrs. Sheetal Borkar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P. Dhivahar, Jt. CIT(DR)
Section 194ASection 194A(1)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 51

TDS under section 194A. ITA Nos.368 & 369/Bang/2015 & SP Nos.51 & 52/Bang/2015 Page 15 of 17 3. A question has also been raised as to whether normal members, associate members and sympathizer members are also covered by the exemption under section 194A(3)(v). It is hereby clarified that the exemption is available only to such members who have joined in application

ITO, BANGALORE vs. THE BHARAT CO-OPERATIVE BANK (MUMBAI) LTD.,, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals by the Revenue and CO by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 962/BANG/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore04 Nov 2015AY 2011-12

Bench: Smt. Asha Vijayaraghavan & Shri Jason P. Boaz

For Respondent: Dr. P.K. Srihari, Addl. CIT (DR)
Section 194ASection 194A(1)Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 201(1)Section 3

TDS under section 194A. 3. A question has also been raised as to whether normal members, associate members and sympathizer members are also covered by the exemption under section 194A(3)(v). It is hereby clarified that the exemption is available only to such members who have joined in application for the registration of the co-operative society and those

DCIT, BANGALORE vs. M/S CITIZEN CO-OP BANK LTD.,, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 861/BANG/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Jan 2016AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri. N. V. Vasudevan & Shri. Abraham P. George

For Appellant: Shri. Muralikrishna, CAFor Respondent: Shri. G. R. Reddy, CIT – DR-I
Section 194ASection 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)

TDS under section 194A. 3. A question has also been raised as to whether normal members, associate members and sympathizer members are also covered by the exemption under section 194A(3)(v). It is hereby clarified that the exemption is available only to such members who have joined in application for the registration of the co-operative society and those

STATE BANK OF INDIA,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 16(2), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 1642/BANG/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Dec 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri H. Muralidhara, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. R. Premi, Jt. CIT(DR)(ITAT) Bengaluru
Section 194Section 194ASection 194A(3)(iii)Section 201(1)Section 44A

TDS) treating the assessee as one in default u/s.201(1) and levying interest u/s.201(1A) of the Act.” Page 11 of 11 7. Since this Tribunal has already taken a view that the person to whom interest was paid was falling within the ambit of section 194A(3)(f

CANARA BANK (ERSTWHILE SYNDICATE BANK),BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), BANGALORE, BENGALURU

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 937/BANG/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore16 Oct 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Ms. Brinda Rameswaran, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, D.R
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14ASection 250

TDS is not to be deducted. It is very relevant to note that at the time of Acquisition Act was enacted, Central Government had issued a Notification No. SO 710 dated 16/02/1970 [1970] [Reported in 75 ITR (Stat) 106] which reads as under:- 58. Income-tax Act, 1961: Notification under sec. 194A(3)(iii)(f) Notification

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(2)(1), BANGALORE vs. CANARA BANK (ERSTWHILE SYNDICATE BANK), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1499/BANG/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore06 Nov 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Shri Vishal Bhat - CAFor Respondent: Dr. Manjunath Karkihalli, CIT (DR)
Section 115JSection 211(2)

3) of section 194A, deals with such entities. The said clause reads as under:- iii) to such income credited or paid to- (a) any banking company to which the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949), applies, or any co-operative society engaged in carrying on the business of banking (including a co-operative land mortgage bank

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(2)(1), BANGALORE vs. CANARA BANK (ERSTWHILE SYNDICATE BANK), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1498/BANG/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore06 Nov 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Shri Vishal Bhat - CAFor Respondent: Dr. Manjunath Karkihalli, CIT (DR)
Section 115JSection 211(2)

3) of section 194A, deals with such entities. The said clause reads as under:- iii) to such income credited or paid to- (a) any banking company to which the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949), applies, or any co-operative society engaged in carrying on the business of banking (including a co-operative land mortgage bank

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), BENGALURU, BENGALURU vs. CANARA BANK, BENGALURU

In the result, appeal of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 297/BANG/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Keshav Dubeyassessmentyear: 2017-18

For Appellant: Sri Abharana &Anantham, A.RsFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, D.R
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14ASection 234BSection 250

TDS is not to be deducted. It is very relevant to note that at the time of Acquisition Act was enacted, Central Government had issued a Notification No. SO 710 dated 16/02/1970 [1970] [Reported in 75 ITR (Stat) 106] which reads as under:- 58. Income-tax Act, 1961: Notification under sec. 194A(3)(iii)(f) Notification

THE CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFICER,,MYSORE vs. ITO, MYSORE

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for all the three assessment years are allowed

ITA 188/BANG/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore31 Mar 2015AY 2007-08

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri Abraham P George

For Appellant: Shri Narendra Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr.K. Shankar Prasad, JCIT(DR)
Section 133ASection 194ASection 196Section 201

194A(3)(iii)(f) would be admissible to an assessee who made payments to a company whose shares are held by the Govt. or held by the RBI or held by the corporation owned by RBI. Thereafter the Assessing Officer took into consideration the shareholding pattern of KUIDFC in Paragraph No.5.6 of the impugned order. The details read as under

M/S KARNATAKA EMTA COAL MINES LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, assessee’s appeals are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2135/BANG/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Nov 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Gudimella V.P. Pavan Kumar &
Section 32(1)(ii)Section 35ESection 37

194A. The assessee submits that these expenses are revenue in nature and has been debited in the Profit and Loss Account. 17.1 The AO as well as Ld. CIT(A) has disallowed the interest paid on delayed payment of TDS without appreciating the facts and the prevalent law of the land. It is the humble submission of the assessee that

M/S KARNATAKA EMTA COAL MINES LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, assessee’s appeals are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2138/BANG/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Nov 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Gudimella V.P. Pavan Kumar &
Section 32(1)(ii)Section 35ESection 37

194A. The assessee submits that these expenses are revenue in nature and has been debited in the Profit and Loss Account. 17.1 The AO as well as Ld. CIT(A) has disallowed the interest paid on delayed payment of TDS without appreciating the facts and the prevalent law of the land. It is the humble submission of the assessee that

M/S KARNATAKA EMTA COAL MINES LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, assessee’s appeals are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2137/BANG/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Nov 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Gudimella V.P. Pavan Kumar &
Section 32(1)(ii)Section 35ESection 37

194A. The assessee submits that these expenses are revenue in nature and has been debited in the Profit and Loss Account. 17.1 The AO as well as Ld. CIT(A) has disallowed the interest paid on delayed payment of TDS without appreciating the facts and the prevalent law of the land. It is the humble submission of the assessee that

M/S KARNATAKA EMTA COAL MINES LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, assessee’s appeals are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2139/BANG/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Nov 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Gudimella V.P. Pavan Kumar &
Section 32(1)(ii)Section 35ESection 37

194A. The assessee submits that these expenses are revenue in nature and has been debited in the Profit and Loss Account. 17.1 The AO as well as Ld. CIT(A) has disallowed the interest paid on delayed payment of TDS without appreciating the facts and the prevalent law of the land. It is the humble submission of the assessee that

M/S KARNATAKA EMTA COAL MINES LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, assessee’s appeals are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2136/BANG/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Nov 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Gudimella V.P. Pavan Kumar &
Section 32(1)(ii)Section 35ESection 37

194A. The assessee submits that these expenses are revenue in nature and has been debited in the Profit and Loss Account. 17.1 The AO as well as Ld. CIT(A) has disallowed the interest paid on delayed payment of TDS without appreciating the facts and the prevalent law of the land. It is the humble submission of the assessee that

ASSISSTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCLE, HUBBALLI vs. M/S. DAVANAGERE URBAN CO-OP BANK LTD, DAVANAGERE

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1815/BANG/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Dec 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri B.R Baskaran & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year : 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri M Narasimha Raju, JCITFor Respondent: Smt. Soumya K, Advocate
Section 1Section 194(3)Section 194ASection 194A(3)(v)Section 197ASection 201Section 201(1)

3)(v) of the Act. It was further submitted that the above said provisions were amended w.e.f 1/6/2015 making interest paid to members also liable to tax deduction at source. However, the Board has clarified in Circular No.19/2015 dated 27/11/2015 that the amended ITA No.1815 /Bang/2018 Page 5 of 12 provisions shall apply to the payment of interest made

BSR INFRATECH INDIA LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 697/BANG/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Oct 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year: 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Madhusudhan, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Praveen Karanth, D.R
Section 199Section 234ASection 270ASection 43Section 43C

f the case and in accordance with law. Further, in the case of CIT Vs. Associated Cables Pvt. Ltd.(286 ITR 596) the Bombay High Court held that-- “The question of law sought to be raised in this appeal is as to whether the retention money could be considered to be the income of the assessee in the year

CANARA BANK,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS), BANGALORE

In the result, these appeals filed by the assessees for A

ITA 1476/BANG/2014[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore12 Aug 2015AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Jason P. Boaz

For Appellant: Shri Balaram R Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr.P.K. Srihari, Addl. CIT (D.R.)
Section 12ASection 194ASection 196ASection 197(1)Section 2(15)Section 201Section 201(1)

TDS), LTU, Bangalore levying interest under Section 201(1A) of the Act. 3. The learned CIT (Appeals), LTU failed to appreciate the fact that the Board is a body corporate covered by section 194A(3)(iii)(f

KARNATAKA VIKAS GRAMEEN BANK,DHARWAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TS WARD-1, HUBLI

In the result, ITA Nos.1526 & 1527/Bang/2017 are allowed, while

ITA 1527/BANG/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Feb 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri Ravishankar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Priyadarshi Mishra, Addl.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 200Section 201(1)Section 250Section 254

3) The provisions of sub-section (1) shall not apply- (1) where the amount of such income or, as the case may be, the aggregate of the amounts of such income credited or paid or likely to be credited or paid during the financial year by the person referred to in sub-section (1) to the account