BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “TDS”+ Section 192Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi20Chennai5Ahmedabad4Bangalore4Indore4Mumbai2Surat1Panaji1Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 270A8Disallowance3Section 192B2Section 143(3)2Section 9(1)(vii)2Section 1482Deduction2Penalty2TDS2

GOOGLE LLC (FORMERLY KNOWN AS GOOGLE INC.),CALIFORNIA vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (OSD) INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-1(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 167/BANG/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 Feb 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S.It(It)A No. 167/Bang/2021 - Ay : 2010-11) It(It)A No. 688/Bang/2022 - Ay : 2012-13)

For Appellant: Shri Percy Pardiwala, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 9(1)(vii)

Section 192 of the Act against salary and other allowances paid/payable to such seconded employees and deposited the same with the Government of India. This is evident from Form No. 16 issued by GIPL to its employees, which are placed on record (refer pages 102 to 107 and 113 to 121 of DPP paper book for AY 2010-11). Moreover

M/S. BIESSE MANUFACTURING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 338/BANG/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore31 Oct 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: Shri, Tata Krishna, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sankar K. Ganeshan, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 234BSection 92C

section 92B. 13.13 In so far as the question of rate of interest is concerned, we find that this issue is no more res integra in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of Cotton Naturals (I) (P.) Ltd. (supra), in which it has been held that it is the currency in which

VEETIL KIZHAKKE NIRMAL,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(3)(6), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 7/BANG/2024[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Bangalore04 Mar 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Tarun, G., AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subramanian S., Addl.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 192BSection 270A

section 270AA of the Act which were enclosed as Annexure D & E. He submitted that the CIT(Appeals) has wrongly dismissed the appeals of the assessee. He submitted that similar issue has been decided by the coordinate Bench in ITA No.411/Bang/2013 for AY 2017-18, order dated 14.09.2023 in the case of Akshata Vishwas Tudavekar, who is assessee’s wife

VEETIL KIZHAKKE NIRMAL,BANGALORE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(3)(6), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 8/BANG/2024[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Bangalore04 Mar 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Tarun, G., AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subramanian S., Addl.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 192BSection 270A

section 270AA of the Act which were enclosed as Annexure D & E. He submitted that the CIT(Appeals) has wrongly dismissed the appeals of the assessee. He submitted that similar issue has been decided by the coordinate Bench in ITA No.411/Bang/2013 for AY 2017-18, order dated 14.09.2023 in the case of Akshata Vishwas Tudavekar, who is assessee’s wife