KEMPAIAH NAGARAJ,BANGALORE vs. NA, NA
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed
ITA 2651/BANG/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Feb 2026AY 2016-17
Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Vice – & Shri Soundararajan K.Assessment Year : 2016-17
For Appellant: Shri S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Balusamy N, JCIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 148Section 148ASection 151ASection 194ISection 54F
Section 151A and Faceless
Reassessment Scheme
6. Without prejudice, the Learned Commissioner (Appeals) also erred in not considering the detailed responses and evidences filed before the Assessing Officer, justifying the claim of indexed costs of acquisition and improvement and exemption u/s. 54F.
And for other reasons and grounds that may be adduced later, it is humbly prayed that this appeal
