BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

291 results for “TDS”+ Reopening of Assessmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,037Delhi765Chennai603Indore412Pune403Bangalore291Hyderabad259Ahmedabad209Kolkata199Jaipur127Chandigarh120Visakhapatnam112Surat95Cochin93Raipur79Rajkot57Cuttack47Nagpur47Ranchi43Agra35Lucknow34Patna30Guwahati27Karnataka20Allahabad19Amritsar15Panaji14Jabalpur8Dehradun8SC5Jodhpur4Varanasi3Calcutta2Telangana2Kerala1

Key Topics

Section 148123Section 14777Addition to Income66Section 234E50Section 143(3)47TDS40Disallowance34Section 271H32Deduction28Reopening of Assessment

MR.M J ARAVIND ,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-2(3)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 222/BANG/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year: 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri Narendra Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Priyadarshi Mishra, Addl.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 14ASection 48Section 57

reopening the assessment:- 1. Interest income from Woodstock Ambience Pvt. Ltd. During the FY:2010-11 relevant to the AY:2011-12 it was observed that as per 26AS the assessee has earned interest income of Rs.17,63,930/- on which TDS

Showing 1–20 of 291 · Page 1 of 15

...
27
Section 4026
Section 200A24

FIBRES & FABRICS INTERNATIONAL P LTD,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCEL-11(3), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1352/BANG/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore10 Feb 2016AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Vijaypal Rao & Shri Inturi Rama Raom/S.Fibres & Fabrics International Pvt. Ltd. No.21, E-1, 2Nd Phase, Peenya Industrial Area, Bangalore-560058. … Appellant Pan: Aaacf 6841 M Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle 11(3), Bangalore. … Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Nageswar Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt.Neera Malhotra, CIT(DR)
Section 147Section 253Section 32(1)(ii)

reopening the earlier assessment order. (iv) The facts in that case are that during the course of original assessment proceedings for assessment year 2004-05, the AO had called upon the assessee to give details of labour charges which were made available along with the details of the quantum of work done, TDS

M/S. NITESH ESTATES LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 5(1)(2), BANGALORE

In the result appeal filed by assessee stands allowed on legal issue raised in ground no

ITA 1486/BANG/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 Apr 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year : 2009-10 M/S. Nitesh Estates The Deputy Ltd., Commissioner Of Nitesh Time Square, Income Tax, 7Th Floor, #8, M.G. Road, Circle – 5 [1][2], Bangalore – 560 001. Vs. Bangalore. Pan: Aabcn9267C Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri V. Srinivasan, Advocate : Shri Sankar Ganesh K, Jcit Revenue By (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 04-02-2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 20-04-2022 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Appeal Has Been Filed By Assessee Against Order Dated 28/03/2019 Passed By The Ld. Cit(A)-5, Bangalore For Assessment Year 2009-10 On Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. The Orders Of The Authorities Below In So Far As They Are Against The Appellant Are Opposed To Law, Equity, Weight Of Evidence, Probabilities, Facts & Circumstances Of The Case. 2. The Order Of Re-Assessment Is Bad In Law & Void-Ab- Initio For Want Of Requisite Jurisdiction Especially, The Mandatory Requirements To Assume Jurisdiction U/S 148 Of The Act Did Not Exist & Have Not Been Complied With & Consequently, The Re-Assessment Requires To Be Cancelled. 3. The Learned Cit[A] Ought To Have Appreciated That There Was No Fresh Material To Show That Income Had Escaped Assessment Especially When There Was A Scrutiny

For Appellant: Shri V. Srinivasan, Advocate
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 234

reopening of the assessment by passing a speaking order and consequently, the assessment order passed being a nullity ought to have been cancelled. 6. Without prejudice to the above, the learned CIT[A] is not justified in upholding the disallowance of a sum of Rs.1,02,42,949/- being the business loss under the facts and in the circumstances

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, BANGALORE vs. M/S. GMR HYDERABAD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD,, BANGALORE

In the result, the assessees' appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 598/BANG/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Oct 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Jason P. Boaz

For Respondent: Shri B.K. Panda, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 153A

reopened and assessment u/s. 153A cannot be framed. In the instant case, undisputedly no incriminating material was found, therefore the assessment framed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. ITA Nos.592 to 595/Bang/17 & connected appeals Page 14 of 20 153A of the Act is not sustainable and we accordingly knock down the assessments. 12. Since we have knocked down the entire assessments framed

M/S.GMR HYDERABAD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE

In the result, the assessees' appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 619/BANG/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Oct 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Jason P. Boaz

For Respondent: Shri B.K. Panda, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 153A

reopened and assessment u/s. 153A cannot be framed. In the instant case, undisputedly no incriminating material was found, therefore the assessment framed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. ITA Nos.592 to 595/Bang/17 & connected appeals Page 14 of 20 153A of the Act is not sustainable and we accordingly knock down the assessments. 12. Since we have knocked down the entire assessments framed

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, BANGALORE vs. M/S. DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PVT. LTD., BANGALORE

In the result, the assessees' appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 593/BANG/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Oct 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Jason P. Boaz

For Respondent: Shri B.K. Panda, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 153A

reopened and assessment u/s. 153A cannot be framed. In the instant case, undisputedly no incriminating material was found, therefore the assessment framed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. ITA Nos.592 to 595/Bang/17 & connected appeals Page 14 of 20 153A of the Act is not sustainable and we accordingly knock down the assessments. 12. Since we have knocked down the entire assessments framed

M/S. DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PRIVATE LIMITED,,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE

In the result, the assessees' appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 635/BANG/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Oct 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Jason P. Boaz

For Respondent: Shri B.K. Panda, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 153A

reopened and assessment u/s. 153A cannot be framed. In the instant case, undisputedly no incriminating material was found, therefore the assessment framed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. ITA Nos.592 to 595/Bang/17 & connected appeals Page 14 of 20 153A of the Act is not sustainable and we accordingly knock down the assessments. 12. Since we have knocked down the entire assessments framed

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BANGALORE vs. M/S.GMR HYDERABAD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.,, BANGALORE

In the result, the assessees' appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 634/BANG/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Oct 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Jason P. Boaz

For Respondent: Shri B.K. Panda, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 153A

reopened and assessment u/s. 153A cannot be framed. In the instant case, undisputedly no incriminating material was found, therefore the assessment framed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. ITA Nos.592 to 595/Bang/17 & connected appeals Page 14 of 20 153A of the Act is not sustainable and we accordingly knock down the assessments. 12. Since we have knocked down the entire assessments framed

M/S. GMS HYDERABAD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LIMITED,,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE

In the result, the assessees' appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 602/BANG/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Oct 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Jason P. Boaz

For Respondent: Shri B.K. Panda, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 153A

reopened and assessment u/s. 153A cannot be framed. In the instant case, undisputedly no incriminating material was found, therefore the assessment framed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. ITA Nos.592 to 595/Bang/17 & connected appeals Page 14 of 20 153A of the Act is not sustainable and we accordingly knock down the assessments. 12. Since we have knocked down the entire assessments framed

M/S.GMR HYDERABAD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE

In the result, the assessees' appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 632/BANG/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Oct 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Jason P. Boaz

For Respondent: Shri B.K. Panda, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 153A

reopened and assessment u/s. 153A cannot be framed. In the instant case, undisputedly no incriminating material was found, therefore the assessment framed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. ITA Nos.592 to 595/Bang/17 & connected appeals Page 14 of 20 153A of the Act is not sustainable and we accordingly knock down the assessments. 12. Since we have knocked down the entire assessments framed

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, BANGALORE vs. M/S. GMR HYDERABAD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD,, BANGALORE

In the result, the assessees' appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 600/BANG/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Oct 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Jason P. Boaz

For Respondent: Shri B.K. Panda, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 153A

reopened and assessment u/s. 153A cannot be framed. In the instant case, undisputedly no incriminating material was found, therefore the assessment framed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. ITA Nos.592 to 595/Bang/17 & connected appeals Page 14 of 20 153A of the Act is not sustainable and we accordingly knock down the assessments. 12. Since we have knocked down the entire assessments framed

M/S. DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PRIVATE LIMITED,,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE

In the result, the assessees' appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 595/BANG/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Oct 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Jason P. Boaz

For Respondent: Shri B.K. Panda, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 153A

reopened and assessment u/s. 153A cannot be framed. In the instant case, undisputedly no incriminating material was found, therefore the assessment framed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. ITA Nos.592 to 595/Bang/17 & connected appeals Page 14 of 20 153A of the Act is not sustainable and we accordingly knock down the assessments. 12. Since we have knocked down the entire assessments framed

M/S. DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PRIVATE LIMITED,,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE

In the result, the assessees' appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 621/BANG/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Oct 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Jason P. Boaz

For Respondent: Shri B.K. Panda, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 153A

reopened and assessment u/s. 153A cannot be framed. In the instant case, undisputedly no incriminating material was found, therefore the assessment framed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. ITA Nos.592 to 595/Bang/17 & connected appeals Page 14 of 20 153A of the Act is not sustainable and we accordingly knock down the assessments. 12. Since we have knocked down the entire assessments framed

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, BANGALORE vs. M/S. GMR HYDERABAD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD,, BANGALORE

In the result, the assessees' appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 597/BANG/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Oct 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Jason P. Boaz

For Respondent: Shri B.K. Panda, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 153A

reopened and assessment u/s. 153A cannot be framed. In the instant case, undisputedly no incriminating material was found, therefore the assessment framed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. ITA Nos.592 to 595/Bang/17 & connected appeals Page 14 of 20 153A of the Act is not sustainable and we accordingly knock down the assessments. 12. Since we have knocked down the entire assessments framed

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, BANGALORE vs. M/S. GMR HYDERABAD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD,, BANGALORE

In the result, the assessees' appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 599/BANG/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Oct 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Jason P. Boaz

For Respondent: Shri B.K. Panda, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 153A

reopened and assessment u/s. 153A cannot be framed. In the instant case, undisputedly no incriminating material was found, therefore the assessment framed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. ITA Nos.592 to 595/Bang/17 & connected appeals Page 14 of 20 153A of the Act is not sustainable and we accordingly knock down the assessments. 12. Since we have knocked down the entire assessments framed

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, BANGALORE vs. M/S. DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PVT. LTD., BANGALORE

In the result, the assessees' appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 594/BANG/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Oct 2017AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Jason P. Boaz

For Respondent: Shri B.K. Panda, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 153A

reopened and assessment u/s. 153A cannot be framed. In the instant case, undisputedly no incriminating material was found, therefore the assessment framed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. ITA Nos.592 to 595/Bang/17 & connected appeals Page 14 of 20 153A of the Act is not sustainable and we accordingly knock down the assessments. 12. Since we have knocked down the entire assessments framed

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, BANGALORE vs. M/S. GMR HYDERABAD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD,, BANGALORE

In the result, the assessees' appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 601/BANG/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Oct 2017AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Jason P. Boaz

For Respondent: Shri B.K. Panda, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 153A

reopened and assessment u/s. 153A cannot be framed. In the instant case, undisputedly no incriminating material was found, therefore the assessment framed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. ITA Nos.592 to 595/Bang/17 & connected appeals Page 14 of 20 153A of the Act is not sustainable and we accordingly knock down the assessments. 12. Since we have knocked down the entire assessments framed

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, BANGALORE vs. M/S. DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PVT. LTD., BANGALORE

In the result, the assessees' appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 592/BANG/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Oct 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Jason P. Boaz

For Respondent: Shri B.K. Panda, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 153A

reopened and assessment u/s. 153A cannot be framed. In the instant case, undisputedly no incriminating material was found, therefore the assessment framed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. ITA Nos.592 to 595/Bang/17 & connected appeals Page 14 of 20 153A of the Act is not sustainable and we accordingly knock down the assessments. 12. Since we have knocked down the entire assessments framed

NVIDIA GRAPHICS PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(4), BANGALORE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee s party allowed

ITA 1111/BANG/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Oct 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George George K & Ms. Padmavathi. Sr Assessment Year : 2014-15 M/S. Nvidia Graphics Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit, Mahadevpura Village, Central Circle – 2(4), K. R. Puram Hobli, Marathalli Bangalore. Bagmane Goldstone Building, North Tower, Mahadevpura S.O, Bangalore – 560 048. Pan : Aabcn 9200 H Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. Nageshwar Rao, Advocate Revenue By : Ms. Neha Sahay, Jcit(Dr)(Itat), Bengaluru. Date Of Hearing : 17.10.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 23.10.2024

For Appellant: Shri. Nageshwar Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Neha Sahay, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 234BSection 234CSection 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 28

reopening notice issued against it on ground that assessee had failed to deduct TDS on certain payment and further reassessment order was passed making disallowance under section 40(a)(ia), since assessee had not deducted TDS as detailed in Form 3CD and said fact was not taken into consideration by Assessing

M/S. BIOCON LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LTU,, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed on the legal issue raised in ground no

ITA 1858/BANG/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore09 Jun 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year : 2010-11 The Joint M/S. Biocon Ltd., Commissioner Of 20Th Km, Hosur Road, Income-Tax, Electronic City, Large Tax Payers Bangalore – 560 100. Unit [Ltu], Pan: Aaacb7461R Vs. Bangalore. Appellant Respondent : Shri Padam Chand Khincha, Assessee By Ca Revenue By : Shri Pradeep Kumar, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 20-04-2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 09-06-2022 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Appeal Is Filed By Assessee Against The Order Dated 28.03.2018 Passed By Ld.Cit(A)-3, Bangalore For A.Y. 2010-11 On Following Grounds Of Appeal: “The Grounds Mentioned Herein Below Are Independent & Without Prejudice To The Other Grounds Preferred By The Appellant. 1. That On Facts & Circumstances Of The ' Case & In Law, The Order Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income-Tax Appeals ["Cit(A)"] Dated March 28, 2018 Under Section 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 ("The Act") For Ay 2010-11 To The Extent Prejudicial To The Appellant, Is Bad In Law & Facts & Liable To Be Quashed. 2. Scope Of Re-Assessment Proceedings

For Respondent: Shri Padam Chand Khincha
Section 147Section 250Section 35

TDS of Rs.3,16,42,729/-, advance tax of Rs.20,10,00,000/-. The assessee claimed foreign tax credit of Rs.42,61,934/-. The Ld.AO completed the assessment u/s. 143(3) vide order dated 23.05.2014 computing gross total income of Rs. 72,78,61,570/-. The Ld.AO in the original assessment order disallowed Rs.27,95,73,000/- as notional foreign