M/S VERIFONE INDIA TECHNOLOGY PVT LTD ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-7(1)(2), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals filed by assessee stands allowed

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year : 2011-12 M/S. Verifone India Technology Pvt. Ltd., A 101, 1St Floor, Cyber The Income Tax Park, Plot No. 76, 77 & 78, Officer, Doddathogur Village, Ward – 7 (1) (3), Begur Hobli, Bangalore. Bangalore South Taluk, Vs. Bangalore – 560 100. Pan: Aaccv1683K Appellant Respondent & Assessment Year : 2012-13 M/S. Verifone India Technology Pvt. Ltd., A 101, 1St Floor, Cyber The Deputy Park, Plot No. 76, 77 & 78, Commissioner Of Doddathogur Village, Income Tax, Begur Hobli, Circle – 7 (1)(2), Bangalore South Taluk, Vs. Bangalore. Bangalore – 560 100. Pan: Aaccv1683K Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri K.R. Vasudevan, Advocate : Shri Priyadarshi Mishra, Addl. Revenue By Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 22-02-2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 25-03-2022

Depreciation on Software cannot be disallowed due to non-deduction of TDS. The Ld.AO disallowed depreciation claimed on the software

M/S VERIFONE INDIA TECHNOLOGY PVT LTD ,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-7(1)(3), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals filed by assessee stands allowed

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year : 2011-12 M/S. Verifone India Technology Pvt. Ltd., A 101, 1St Floor, Cyber The Income Tax Park, Plot No. 76, 77 & 78, Officer, Doddathogur Village, Ward – 7 (1) (3), Begur Hobli, Bangalore. Bangalore South Taluk, Vs. Bangalore – 560 100. Pan: Aaccv1683K Appellant Respondent & Assessment Year : 2012-13 M/S. Verifone India Technology Pvt. Ltd., A 101, 1St Floor, Cyber The Deputy Park, Plot No. 76, 77 & 78, Commissioner Of Doddathogur Village, Income Tax, Begur Hobli, Circle – 7 (1)(2), Bangalore South Taluk, Vs. Bangalore. Bangalore – 560 100. Pan: Aaccv1683K Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri K.R. Vasudevan, Advocate : Shri Priyadarshi Mishra, Addl. Revenue By Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 22-02-2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 25-03-2022

Depreciation on Software cannot be disallowed due to non-deduction of TDS. The Ld.AO disallowed depreciation claimed on the software

BHARAT ELECTRONICS LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. CIT, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

depreciation on plant and machinery under Rule 5(2), grants from the Government and income and TDS credit as per 26AS

M/S. SAMSUNG R & D INSTITUTE INDIA BANGALORE PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 6(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee as per revised grounds stands allowed and the appeals filed by the revenue stands dismissed for the years under consideration

Bench: Smt Beena Pillai & Shri Waseem Ahmed

TDS was not effectuated. The assessee capitalised the cost and depreciation was claimed @60%. The Ld.AO proceeded to disallow the depreciation

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX, SPECIAL RANGE - 6, BANGALORE vs. M/S. SAMSUNG R & D INSTITUTE INDIA-BANGALORE PRIVATE LIMITED, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee as per revised grounds stands allowed and the appeals filed by the revenue stands dismissed for the years under consideration

Bench: Smt Beena Pillai & Shri Waseem Ahmed

TDS was not effectuated. The assessee capitalised the cost and depreciation was claimed @60%. The Ld.AO proceeded to disallow the depreciation

M/S. SAMSUNG R & D INSTITUTE INDIA BANGALORE PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME- TAX, CIRCLE - 6(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee as per revised grounds stands allowed and the appeals filed by the revenue stands dismissed for the years under consideration

Bench: Smt Beena Pillai & Shri Waseem Ahmed

TDS was not effectuated. The assessee capitalised the cost and depreciation was claimed @60%. The Ld.AO proceeded to disallow the depreciation

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SPECIAL RANGE - 6, BANGALORE vs. M/S. SAMSUNG R &D INSTITUTE INDIA- BANGALORE PRIVATE LIMITED, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee as per revised grounds stands allowed and the appeals filed by the revenue stands dismissed for the years under consideration

Bench: Smt Beena Pillai & Shri Waseem Ahmed

TDS was not effectuated. The assessee capitalised the cost and depreciation was claimed @60%. The Ld.AO proceeded to disallow the depreciation

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, SPECIAL RANGE-6, BANGALORE vs. M/S. SAMSUNG R & D INSTITUTE INDIA-BANGALORE PRIVATE LIMITED, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee as per revised grounds stands allowed and the appeals filed by the revenue stands dismissed for the years under consideration

Bench: Smt Beena Pillai & Shri Waseem Ahmed

TDS was not effectuated. The assessee capitalised the cost and depreciation was claimed @60%. The Ld.AO proceeded to disallow the depreciation

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SPECIAL RANGE - 6, BANGALORE vs. M/S. SAMSUNG R & D INSTITUTE INDIA -BANGALORE PRIVATE LIMITED, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee as per revised\ngrounds stands allowed and the appeals filed by the revenue\nstands dismissed for the years under consideration

TDS was not effectuated. The\nassessee capitalised the cost and depreciation was claimed\n@60%. The Ld.AO proceeded to disallow

M/S. INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PVT LTD,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), BENGALURU

In the result the appeal filed by assessee stands allowed partly

Bench: Shri B. R. Baskaran & Smt. Beena Pillaiit(Tp)A No.2870/Bang/2017 Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. Infineon Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. Deputy Commissioner 9Th Floor Prestige Of Income-Tax Thirulakshmi Vs. Circle-3(1)(1) No.11 M.G. Road Bengaluru Bengaluru 560 001 Pan No : Aabcs6967N Appellant Respondent Appellant By : Shri K.R. Vasudevan, A.R. Shri Sumer Singh Meena, Respondent By : D.R. Date Of Hearing : 13.01.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 31.03.2022 O R D E R Per Beena Pillai: Present Appeal Is Filed By Assessee Against The Order Dated 16/10/2017 Passed By The Ld.Dcit Under Section 143(3) R.W. Section 144C(13) For Assessment Year 2013-14 On Following Grounds Of Appeal: “The Grounds Mentioned Hereinafter Are Without Prejudice To One Another.

TDS under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 16. Disallowance of depreciation on software expenses The Learned AO and the Hon'ble DRP has erred

M/S TE CONNECTIVITY INDIA PVT LTD ,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LARGE TAX PAYERS UNIT CIRCLE-1 , BANGALORE

In the result, both the appeal of the assessee and the appeal of the Revenue are partly allowed

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojariandshri George George K

depreciation u/s 32 of the Act and not allowable to deduct TDS. As such, it cannot be denied depreciation on the purchase

M/S. SAMSUNG R & D INSTITUTE INDIA-BANGALORE PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 12(3), BANGALORE

In the result, both the appeal of the assessee and the appeal of the Revenue are partly allowed

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojariandshri George George K

depreciation u/s 32 of the Act and not allowable to deduct TDS. As such, it cannot be denied depreciation on the purchase

DCIT, BANGALORE vs. M/S EPSILON ADVISORS PVT. LTD.,, BANGALORE

In the result, penalty appeal of the assessee is allowed and penalty appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Arun Kumar Garodia

TDS Depreciation 9,220 Advisory fee on sale of shares- 126,05,71,120 4,00,00,000 reconsidered 125,56,19,475 Less

EPSILON ADVISORS P. LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. CIT, BANGALORE

In the result, penalty appeal of the assessee is allowed and penalty appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Arun Kumar Garodia

TDS Depreciation 9,220 Advisory fee on sale of shares- 126,05,71,120 4,00,00,000 reconsidered 125,56,19,475 Less

DCIT, BANGALORE vs. M/S EPSILON ADVISORS PVT. LTD.,, BANGALORE

In the result, penalty appeal of the assessee is allowed and penalty appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Arun Kumar Garodia

TDS Depreciation 9,220 Advisory fee on sale of shares- 126,05,71,120 4,00,00,000 reconsidered 125,56,19,475 Less

EPSILON ADVISORS P. LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. CIT, BANGALORE

In the result, penalty appeal of the assessee is allowed and penalty appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Arun Kumar Garodia

TDS Depreciation 9,220 Advisory fee on sale of shares- 126,05,71,120 4,00,00,000 reconsidered 125,56,19,475 Less

INFOSYS LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. ADDL.C.I.T, BANGALORE

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for A

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Jason P Boaz

TDS under section 195 and hence not to be disallowed under section 40(a)(i). 4.3 Even otherwise, the disallowance, if any, should not be made in respect of payments actually made during the relevant previous year. 4.4 In any case and without prejudice, depreciation

MPHASIS LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4(1)(1), BANGALORE

Appeal of the assessee is allowed on this issue and the assessment order passed is quashed

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Vice – & Shri Soundararajan K.Assessment Year: 2010-11 Mphasis Limited, First Floor, Laurel Building, Deputy Commissioner Of Bagmane Technology Park, Cv Income Tax-Circle Vs. Raman Nagar, Karnataka 560093 4(1)(1), Bangalore Pan – Aaacb6820C Appellant Respondent : Shri. K R Vasudevan Advocate & Shri Assessee By Ankur Pd : Dr. Divya K. J - Cit Revenue By Date Of Hearing : 03-02-2026 Date Of Pronouncement : 10-04-2026

depreciation of goodwill, TDS, and deduction of amounts previously disallowed due to non-deduction of tax. The AO rejected these