KOGOD BASAVARAJU JAYACHANDRA ,HASSAN vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE

In the result the ITA No

TDS deduction for the business\npurpose of the same. The cash deposited in bank account held by the assessee\nfor

VEERENDRA KUMAR PATIL,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for AY 2013-14 is partly allowed

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

TDS deduction for the business purpose of the same. The cash deposited in Bank accountas held by the assessee for the year

SR. LOGANATHAN MANICKAM,BENGALURU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-5(1)(2), BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year: 2014-15

Cash on various days to issue cheques for construction business as and when required appears to be suspicious because if the intention is-to issue cheques why to withdraw and deposit the same on multiple days? TDS

VEERENDRA KUMAR PATIL,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for AY 2013-14 is partly allowed

TDS deduction for the\nbusiness purpose of the same. The cash deposited in Bank accountas held by\nthe assessee for the year

VEERENDRA KUMAR PATIL,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed in above\nterms

TDS deduction for the\nbusiness purpose of the same. The cash deposited in Bank accountas held by\nthe assessee for the year

SMT. NISHITA NANDISH ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for AY 2013-14 is partly allowed

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

TDS deduction for the business purpose of the same. The cash deposited in Oriental Bank of Commerce in account No.105710110004

SMT. NISHITA NANDISH,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for AY 2013-14 is partly allowed

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

TDS deduction for the business purpose of the same. The cash deposited in Oriental Bank of Commerce in account No.105710110004

SMT. NISHITA NANDISH,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for AY 2013-14 is partly allowed

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

TDS deduction for the business purpose of the same. The cash deposited in Oriental Bank of Commerce in account No.105710110004

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), BANGALORE , BANGALORE vs. SRI RAMAPPA CHANDRU , BANGALORE

In the result, out of seven appeals of the assessee, two appeals for A

Bench: Shri Arun Kumar Garodia & Shri Laliet Kumar

deposit in bank. Hence the remaining benefit available is only Rs. 34.54 Lakhs but CIT(A) has allowed telescoping benefit of Rs. 54 Lakhs. But this is also important that the assessee has declared extra income in Assessment Year 2013-14 of Rs. 1.8 Crores. Although such income was not added by the AO in the assessment order

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), BANGALORE , BANGALORE vs. SRI RAMAPPA CHANDRU , BANGALORE

In the result, out of seven appeals of the assessee, two appeals for A

Bench: Shri Arun Kumar Garodia & Shri Laliet Kumar

deposit in bank. Hence the remaining benefit available is only Rs. 34.54 Lakhs but CIT(A) has allowed telescoping benefit of Rs. 54 Lakhs. But this is also important that the assessee has declared extra income in Assessment Year 2013-14 of Rs. 1.8 Crores. Although such income was not added by the AO in the assessment order

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), BANGALORE vs. SRI RAMAPPA CHANDRU , BANGALORE

In the result, out of seven appeals of the assessee, two appeals for A

Bench: Shri Arun Kumar Garodia & Shri Laliet Kumar

deposit in bank. Hence the remaining benefit available is only Rs. 34.54 Lakhs but CIT(A) has allowed telescoping benefit of Rs. 54 Lakhs. But this is also important that the assessee has declared extra income in Assessment Year 2013-14 of Rs. 1.8 Crores. Although such income was not added by the AO in the assessment order

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), BANGALORE , BANGALORE vs. SRI RAMAPPA CHANDRU , BANGALORE

In the result, out of seven appeals of the assessee, two appeals for A

Bench: Shri Arun Kumar Garodia & Shri Laliet Kumar

deposit in bank. Hence the remaining benefit available is only Rs. 34.54 Lakhs but CIT(A) has allowed telescoping benefit of Rs. 54 Lakhs. But this is also important that the assessee has declared extra income in Assessment Year 2013-14 of Rs. 1.8 Crores. Although such income was not added by the AO in the assessment order

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), BANGALORE , BANGALORE vs. SRI RAMAPPA CHANDRU , BANGALORE

In the result, out of seven appeals of the assessee, two appeals for A

Bench: Shri Arun Kumar Garodia & Shri Laliet Kumar

deposit in bank. Hence the remaining benefit available is only Rs. 34.54 Lakhs but CIT(A) has allowed telescoping benefit of Rs. 54 Lakhs. But this is also important that the assessee has declared extra income in Assessment Year 2013-14 of Rs. 1.8 Crores. Although such income was not added by the AO in the assessment order

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), BANGALORE , BANGALORE vs. SRI RAMAPPA CHANDRU , BANGALORE

In the result, out of seven appeals of the assessee, two appeals for A

Bench: Shri Arun Kumar Garodia & Shri Laliet Kumar

deposit in bank. Hence the remaining benefit available is only Rs. 34.54 Lakhs but CIT(A) has allowed telescoping benefit of Rs. 54 Lakhs. But this is also important that the assessee has declared extra income in Assessment Year 2013-14 of Rs. 1.8 Crores. Although such income was not added by the AO in the assessment order

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), BANGALORE vs. SRI RAMAPPA CHANDRU , BANGALORE

In the result, out of seven appeals of the assessee, two appeals for A

Bench: Shri Arun Kumar Garodia & Shri Laliet Kumar

deposit in bank. Hence the remaining benefit available is only Rs. 34.54 Lakhs but CIT(A) has allowed telescoping benefit of Rs. 54 Lakhs. But this is also important that the assessee has declared extra income in Assessment Year 2013-14 of Rs. 1.8 Crores. Although such income was not added by the AO in the assessment order

SRI RAMAPPA CHANDRU @ R CHANDRU ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), BANGALORE

In the result, out of seven appeals of the assessee, two appeals for A

Bench: Shri Arun Kumar Garodia & Shri Laliet Kumar

deposit in bank. Hence the remaining benefit available is only Rs. 34.54 Lakhs but CIT(A) has allowed telescoping benefit of Rs. 54 Lakhs. But this is also important that the assessee has declared extra income in Assessment Year 2013-14 of Rs. 1.8 Crores. Although such income was not added by the AO in the assessment order

SRI RAMAPPA CHANDRU @ R.CHANDRU ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), BANGALORE

In the result, out of seven appeals of the assessee, two appeals for A

Bench: Shri Arun Kumar Garodia & Shri Laliet Kumar

deposit in bank. Hence the remaining benefit available is only Rs. 34.54 Lakhs but CIT(A) has allowed telescoping benefit of Rs. 54 Lakhs. But this is also important that the assessee has declared extra income in Assessment Year 2013-14 of Rs. 1.8 Crores. Although such income was not added by the AO in the assessment order

SRI RAMAPPA CHANDRU @ R CHANDRU ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), BANGALORE

In the result, out of seven appeals of the assessee, two appeals for A

Bench: Shri Arun Kumar Garodia & Shri Laliet Kumar

deposit in bank. Hence the remaining benefit available is only Rs. 34.54 Lakhs but CIT(A) has allowed telescoping benefit of Rs. 54 Lakhs. But this is also important that the assessee has declared extra income in Assessment Year 2013-14 of Rs. 1.8 Crores. Although such income was not added by the AO in the assessment order

SRI RAMAPPA CHANDRU @ R CHANDRU ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), BANGALORE

In the result, out of seven appeals of the assessee, two appeals for A

Bench: Shri Arun Kumar Garodia & Shri Laliet Kumar

deposit in bank. Hence the remaining benefit available is only Rs. 34.54 Lakhs but CIT(A) has allowed telescoping benefit of Rs. 54 Lakhs. But this is also important that the assessee has declared extra income in Assessment Year 2013-14 of Rs. 1.8 Crores. Although such income was not added by the AO in the assessment order