BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 8clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai18,455Delhi14,866Bangalore5,216Chennai5,196Kolkata4,760Ahmedabad2,259Pune1,890Hyderabad1,523Jaipur1,263Surat937Indore844Chandigarh764Karnataka599Cochin563Rajkot545Raipur479Visakhapatnam456Nagpur410Lucknow367Amritsar324Cuttack290Panaji173Telangana170Jodhpur162Guwahati149Patna145Ranchi136SC128Dehradun112Agra108Calcutta93Allahabad84Kerala58Jabalpur48Varanasi33Punjab & Haryana29Orissa13Rajasthan11Himachal Pradesh8A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN7Andhra Pradesh2Gauhati2RANJAN GOGOI PRAFULLA C. PANT1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Tripura1Uttarakhand1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)3Section 2602

M/S MERIDIAN PROMOTERS (P) lTD., vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result, the Appeal is allowed and the order, dated 26

ITTA/157/2019HC Andhra Pradesh17 Oct 2019

Bench: The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeal) In Ita.No.0782/Cc-2,Vizag/Cit(A)-

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 260A

disallowance of 25% of the labor chares is not right in law. There was no gross negligence on the part of the assessee. There was no mala fide intention on the part of the assessee in not preferring the appeal within the period of limitation. When substantial justice and technical consideration are pitted against each other, the cause of substantial

SRI MAHESH GURRAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITTA/20/2024HC Andhra Pradesh22 Aug 2024

Bench: G.NARENDAR,KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

For Respondent: SRI VIJAY KUMAR PUNNA (STANDING
Section 12ASection 138Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 151Section 23Section 260

disallowing the appeal filed by the Appellant on grounds of delay despite there being sufficient cause for delay in instituting the appeal? C. Whether the Hon'ble ITAT erred by not holding that procedural laws are handmaiden of justice and that the CIT(A) and Hon’ble ITAT should not have taken a hyper-technical approach while condoning the delay