BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 4clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai22,331Delhi16,917Chennai6,538Kolkata6,149Bangalore5,784Ahmedabad2,540Pune2,155Hyderabad1,679Jaipur1,458Surat1,033Indore949Chandigarh824Cochin815Karnataka780Rajkot613Nagpur493Raipur492Visakhapatnam485Lucknow439Cuttack358Amritsar344Telangana213Jodhpur206Panaji190Patna188Guwahati180Ranchi176Calcutta170Agra154SC147Dehradun139Allahabad90Jabalpur84Kerala74Punjab & Haryana40Varanasi35Orissa17Rajasthan11Himachal Pradesh8A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN7Uttarakhand2Gauhati2Andhra Pradesh2ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1RANJAN GOGOI PRAFULLA C. PANT1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1Tripura1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1J&K1Bombay1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)3Section 2602

SRI MAHESH GURRAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITTA/20/2024HC Andhra Pradesh22 Aug 2024

Bench: G.NARENDAR,KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

For Respondent: SRI VIJAY KUMAR PUNNA (STANDING
Section 12ASection 138Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 151Section 23Section 260

4), Visakhapatnam. Between: Sri Mahesh Gurram, R/o.39-33-100/2, Plot No.401, Opp.East Park, Visakhapatnam. ...APPELLANT AND Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1), Visakhapatnam. ...RESPONDENT lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition filed under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation

M/S MERIDIAN PROMOTERS (P) lTD., vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result, the Appeal is allowed and the order, dated 26

ITTA/157/2019HC Andhra Pradesh17 Oct 2019

Bench: The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeal) In Ita.No.0782/Cc-2,Vizag/Cit(A)-

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 260A

Section 142(1) of the Act was issued. Ultimately, the respondent had disallowed Rs.37,23,478/- inter alia for the reason that the appellant had not produced sufficient information and/or the information produced by the appellant is not acceptable. When the appellant submitted the vouchers for the said amount claimed by the appellant, the respondent rejected the same assigning