Search: disallowance | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 23clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai8,723 Delhi7,489 Bangalore2,780 Chennai2,218 Kolkata2,116 Ahmedabad1,083 Jaipur895 Hyderabad779 Pune650 Indore460 Chandigarh453 Surat377 Raipur366 Rajkot246 Amritsar220 Nagpur207 Karnataka204 Cochin190 Lucknow184 Visakhapatnam184 Agra108 Cuttack103 Guwahati81 Jodhpur77 Telangana75 SC74 Ranchi72 Allahabad72 Patna59 Panaji59 Calcutta54 Varanasi33 Dehradun30 Kerala26 Jabalpur25 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN6 Punjab & Haryana5 Rajasthan4 Himachal Pradesh3 Orissa3 Andhra Pradesh2 Gauhati1 MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1 Tripura1 Uttarakhand1 H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1 ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1 ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)3 Section 2602

M/S MERIDIAN PROMOTERS (P) lTD., vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result, the Appeal is allowed and the order, dated 26

ITTA/157/2019HC Andhra Pradesh17 Oct 2019

Bench: The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeal) In Ita.No.0782/Cc-2,Vizag/Cit(A)-

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 260A

Section 142(1) of the Act was issued. Ultimately, the respondent had disallowed Rs.37,23,478/- inter alia for the reason

SRI MAHESH GURRAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITTA/20/2024HC Andhra Pradesh22 Aug 2024

Bench: G.NARENDAR,KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

SRI VIJAY KUMAR PUNNA (STANDING

For Respondent:

Section 12ASection 138Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 151Section 23Section 260

disallowing the appeal filed by the Appellant on grounds of delay despite there being sufficient cause for delay in instituting the appeal? C. Whether the Hon'ble ITAT erred by not holding that procedural laws are handmaiden of justice and that the CIT(A) and Hon’ble ITAT should not have taken a hyper-technical approach while condoning the delay