BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 143(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai16,632Delhi10,984Kolkata4,569Bangalore3,678Chennai3,381Ahmedabad1,917Pune1,559Jaipur1,264Hyderabad1,200Indore865Surat846Chandigarh699Rajkot516Cochin495Raipur481Visakhapatnam462Nagpur379Amritsar366Lucknow340Karnataka318Panaji217Agra184Jodhpur178Cuttack160Guwahati154Patna148Ranchi106Dehradun102Telangana96Allahabad89Calcutta83Jabalpur71Varanasi53SC44Kerala27Punjab & Haryana17Orissa7Himachal Pradesh6Rajasthan3Andhra Pradesh2Uttarakhand2Gauhati2Bombay1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Tripura1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)3Section 2602

SRI MAHESH GURRAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITTA/20/2024HC Andhra Pradesh22 Aug 2024

Bench: G.NARENDAR,KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

For Respondent: SRI VIJAY KUMAR PUNNA (STANDING
Section 12ASection 138Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 151Section 23Section 260

1 OF 2024 Petition filed under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of the Order dated 21.03.2014 passed by the Assessing Officer under Section 143(3) of the Act, assessing the total income of the Appellant at Rs.1

M/S MERIDIAN PROMOTERS (P) lTD., vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result, the Appeal is allowed and the order, dated 26

ITTA/157/2019HC Andhra Pradesh17 Oct 2019

Bench: The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeal) In Ita.No.0782/Cc-2,Vizag/Cit(A)-

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 260A

143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [‘the Act’, for short] was first issued. Subsequently, notice under Section 142(1) of the Act was issued. Ultimately, the respondent had disallowed