BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1 result for “disallowance”+ Section 10(29)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai6,630Delhi5,858Bangalore2,108Chennai1,886Kolkata1,690Ahmedabad969Jaipur676Hyderabad669Pune520Indore407Chandigarh362Surat311Raipur310Rajkot213Karnataka212Amritsar179Lucknow163Nagpur163Cochin157Visakhapatnam138Agra111Panaji98Cuttack90Guwahati66SC61Jodhpur59Patna54Ranchi50Allahabad49Telangana45Calcutta45Dehradun30Varanasi25Kerala20Jabalpur15Punjab & Haryana5A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Orissa3Rajasthan3MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1Himachal Pradesh1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Tripura1ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1Andhra Pradesh1

M/S MERIDIAN PROMOTERS (P) lTD., vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result, the Appeal is allowed and the order, dated 26

ITTA/157/2019HC Andhra Pradesh17 Oct 2019

Bench: The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeal) In Ita.No.0782/Cc-2,Vizag/Cit(A)-

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 260A

29,36,056/-) amounting to Rs.32,34,014/- is not right in law. The Tribunal ought to have considered that the disallowance of 25% of the labor chares is not right in law. There was no gross negligence on the part of the assessee. There was no mala fide intention on the part of the assessee in not preferring