BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 22clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai1,172Delhi1,150Mumbai1,057Kolkata729Pune490Bangalore478Jaipur351Ahmedabad339Hyderabad328Patna198Karnataka185Nagpur174Chandigarh163Surat138Amritsar123Raipur117Visakhapatnam112Indore110Lucknow93Cochin72Panaji69Cuttack68Rajkot58Calcutta53SC39Agra30Telangana26Guwahati24Jodhpur18Varanasi13Dehradun12Allahabad12Jabalpur11Orissa5Himachal Pradesh4Rajasthan4Andhra Pradesh3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Ranchi2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Kerala1DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 2603Section 143(3)3Section 1512

SRI MAHESH GURRAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITTA/20/2024HC Andhra Pradesh22 Aug 2024

Bench: G.NARENDAR,KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

For Respondent: SRI VIJAY KUMAR PUNNA (STANDING
Section 12ASection 138Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 151Section 23Section 260

22-03-2024 passed in I.T.A No.40A/iz/2022 (Assessment year 2011-2012) by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench, Visakhapatnam, filed challenging the Order dated 11-08-2020 passed in DIS & Order No.lTBA/APL/S/250/2020-21/ 1027691960(1), by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Hyderabad-9, which filed against the Order dated 21-03-2014 passed U/s.143(3) of the Income

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SHRI. DHANEKULA RAMA RAO, VIJAYAWADA

The appeal is dismissed as

ITTA/337/2017HC Andhra Pradesh15 Apr 2025

Bench: NINALA JAYASURYA,TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

For Respondent: Sri C.P.Ramaswami
Section 143Section 151Section 260

22-03-2012 passed in ITA No.0239 to 0244/CC, Vij/CIT(A)-I/10-11 by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-I, Hyderabad, which was filed against the Order dated 30-11-2010 passed U/s.143 (3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Assessment year 2009-2010) by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Vijayawada, in PAN No.AIBPD 41891. Between

THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI KOUNDINYA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY

ITTA/179/2019HC Andhra Pradesh29 Oct 2019

Bench: C.PRAVEEN KUMAR,CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

22 November 2011 under Rule 4 of the Bihar (Jharkhand) Electricity Duty Rules 19493 , according to which it was liable to pay duty for distribution and/or consumption of the energy from 1 October 2011. On the basis of the returns submitted by the respondent in Form-III, read with Rule 9 of the Bihar Rules 1949, assessment orders were passed