BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 2(15)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai1,800Mumbai1,632Delhi1,595Kolkata951Bangalore766Pune713Hyderabad574Ahmedabad529Jaipur485Nagpur323Surat287Chandigarh265Patna226Karnataka221Raipur217Visakhapatnam206Indore186Amritsar149Lucknow141Cochin136Cuttack131Rajkot129Panaji83Calcutta55SC47Jodhpur40Guwahati39Dehradun32Agra31Telangana31Jabalpur22Allahabad21Varanasi20Ranchi11Kerala7Orissa6Rajasthan6Himachal Pradesh4Andhra Pradesh2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2R.M. LODHA ANIL R. DAVE1DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1Gauhati1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 1512

THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI KOUNDINYA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY

ITTA/179/2019HC Andhra Pradesh29 Oct 2019

Bench: C.PRAVEEN KUMAR,CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

2 Ch. 149 at 170-171, Court of Appeal (England and Wales) 41 [1983] UKHL 1, [1983] 2 A.C. 237, H.L. (UK) 42 [1985] A.C. 374, H.L. (U.K) 43 [2001] Q.B. 213, C.A (England & Wales) CJ, MSM,J and DVSS,J W.P.Nos.13203 of 2020 & batch 62 expectations.(Nadarajah v. Secretary of State for the Home Department44). 99) A procedural

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S JOCIL LIMITED

Appeal is dismissed

ITTA/147/2018HC Andhra Pradesh20 Aug 2025

Bench: BATTU DEVANAND,A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA

For Respondent: Sri Y N Vivekananda
Section 151Section 260

Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of (179) days in representing the I.T.T.Aand to pass Counsel for the Appellant; 1. ELEVATED AS JUDGE Counsel for the Respondent: 1.ELEVATED AS JUDGE The Court made the following: 2