BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 143(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,241Chennai1,590Delhi1,510Kolkata1,461Bangalore737Pune616Ahmedabad612Hyderabad612Jaipur420Surat344Indore309Chandigarh303Lucknow200Visakhapatnam198Nagpur197Cochin188Rajkot181Amritsar171Karnataka169Raipur163Patna142Cuttack96Panaji92Calcutta82Agra76Guwahati38Jodhpur38Dehradun36Allahabad35Jabalpur31Varanasi22SC15Telangana13Ranchi11Himachal Pradesh4Andhra Pradesh4Orissa3Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)5Section 2603Section 1513

M/S MERIDIAN PROMOTERS (P) lTD., vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result, the Appeal is allowed and the order, dated 26

ITTA/157/2019HC Andhra Pradesh17 Oct 2019

Bench: The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeal) In Ita.No.0782/Cc-2,Vizag/Cit(A)-

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 260A

143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [‘the Act’, for short] was first issued. Subsequently, notice under Section 142(1) of the Act was issued. Ultimately, the respondent had disallowed Rs.37,23,478/- inter alia for the reason that the appellant had not produced sufficient information and/or the information produced by the appellant is not acceptable. When the appellant

SRI MAHESH GURRAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITTA/20/2024HC Andhra Pradesh22 Aug 2024

G.NARENDAR,KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

Bench:
For Respondent: SRI VIJAY KUMAR PUNNA (STANDING
Section 12ASection 138Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 151Section 23Section 260

condoning the delay? Brief facts of the case are: 2. The assessee filed return of income admitting total taxable income at Rs.2,80,551/-, The return was processed under Section 143

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SMT. BOMMANA DURGA SASIKALA

Appeal is dismissed

ITTA/4/2023HC Andhra Pradesh19 Aug 2025

Bench: BATTU DEVANAND,A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA

Section 143(3)Section 151Section 260

143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Assessment year 2015-16 by the Income tax Officer, Ward -1(2), Rajamahendravaram. Between: The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Visakhapatnam passed in ITA Income Tax ...Petitioner/Appellant AND Smt. Bommana Durga Sasikala, Rajamahendravaram. (PAN No.ADAPB3030C). D.No.25-1-18, Jayakrishnapuram, ...Respondent w Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI INCOME TAX) Counsel

THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI KOUNDINYA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY

ITTA/179/2019HC Andhra Pradesh29 Oct 2019

Bench: C.PRAVEEN KUMAR,CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

2 Ch. 149 at 170-171, Court of Appeal (England and Wales) 41 [1983] UKHL 1, [1983] 2 A.C. 237, H.L. (UK) 42 [1985] A.C. 374, H.L. (U.K) 43 [2001] Q.B. 213, C.A (England & Wales) CJ, MSM,J and DVSS,J W.P.Nos.13203 of 2020 & batch 62 expectations.(Nadarajah v. Secretary of State for the Home Department44). 99) A procedural