BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 14clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai1,701Delhi1,646Mumbai1,561Kolkata944Pune865Bangalore835Hyderabad602Jaipur510Ahmedabad494Nagpur317Raipur292Surat289Chandigarh268Karnataka232Visakhapatnam223Indore185Amritsar173Cochin145Cuttack132Lucknow118Rajkot116Panaji103Patna67Calcutta62SC50Jodhpur38Guwahati37Agra34Telangana30Dehradun30Allahabad29Varanasi19Jabalpur15Ranchi9Rajasthan7Orissa6Kerala5Himachal Pradesh4Andhra Pradesh4A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2R.M. LODHA ANIL R. DAVE1Punjab & Haryana1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 1515Section 2602Section 143(3)2

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SMT. BOMMANA DURGA SASIKALA

Appeal is dismissed

ITTA/4/2023HC Andhra Pradesh19 Aug 2025

Bench: BATTU DEVANAND,A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA

Section 143(3)Section 151Section 260

Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to condone the delay of 113 days in representation of the file relating to APPEAL, and to pass Counsel for the Appellant: 1. ELEVATED AS JUDGE Counsel for the Respondent: 2 1.G VN HARI

THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. M/S.BOMMIDALA ENTERPRISES(P) LTD

Appeal is dismissed

ITTA/82/2018HC Andhra Pradesh20 Aug 2025

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench, Visakhapatnam, Preferred Against The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Guntur, Dated 30.03.2012 Bearing Appeal No. Ita No.0320, 0319 & 0279/Cit(A)/Gnt/2011-12, Which Was Preferred Against The Order Of The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-2, Guntur Pan/Gir.No: In Aaacb9064G/A.Y.2009-2010/Ito/Guntur, Dated 30.12.2011. Between: The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Guntur ...Appellant/Respondent & M/S Bommidala Enterprises (P) Ltd, D.No. 8-24-53, Mangalagiri Road Guntur ...Respondent/Appellant

For Respondent: Sri Dundu Manmohan
Section 151Section 260A

Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 174 days in representing the ITTA and to pass Counsel for the Appellant: 1.ELE Counsel for the Respondent: 1.DUNDU MANMOHAN The Court made the following

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SHRI. DHANEKULA RAMA RAO, VIJAYAWADA

The appeal is dismissed as

ITTA/337/2017HC Andhra Pradesh15 Apr 2025

Bench: NINALA JAYASURYA,TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

For Respondent: Sri C.P.Ramaswami
Section 143Section 151Section 260

condone the delay of (134) days in representing the I.T.T.A. ' j Gounsel for the Appellant f % - r* : Sri Vamsi Krishna Bodapati, representing Sri Anup Koushik Karavadi (Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department) Counsel for the Respondent : Sri C.P.Ramaswami The Court made the following; APHC010393172017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3526] r-'' WEDNESDAY

THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI KOUNDINYA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY

ITTA/179/2019HC Andhra Pradesh29 Oct 2019

Bench: C.PRAVEEN KUMAR,CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

14 of the Constitution and thus „non-arbitrariness and unreasonableness‟ have been made the necessary qualifiers for assessing as to whether there was a denial of legitimate expectation or not. 122) In the facts of the case, the farmers of the capital region voluntarily surrendered their land under Andhra Pradesh Capital City Land Pooling Scheme formulated under the provisions