THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI KOUNDINYA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY
ITTA/179/2019HC Andhra Pradesh29 Oct 2019
Bench: C.PRAVEEN KUMAR,CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
131)
In the formative period the doctrine of promissory estoppel
could not be invoked by the promisee unless he had suffered
„detriment‟ or „prejudice‟. All that is required is that the party
asserting the estoppel must have acted upon the assurance
given by him. The alteration of position by the party is the only
indispensable requirement of the doctrine. Thus