BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 11(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai2,237Mumbai2,184Delhi2,043Kolkata1,250Pune1,249Bangalore1,131Hyderabad818Ahmedabad692Jaipur634Surat391Nagpur366Chandigarh356Raipur343Indore267Karnataka248Visakhapatnam247Amritsar231Lucknow227Cochin221Rajkot195Cuttack153Panaji127Patna86Agra71Calcutta68Guwahati64SC57Jodhpur48Dehradun42Telangana37Allahabad36Jabalpur24Varanasi24Ranchi16Rajasthan9Orissa7Kerala5Himachal Pradesh4Andhra Pradesh4Punjab & Haryana3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2R.M. LODHA ANIL R. DAVE1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 1515Section 143(3)3Section 2602Section 260A2Addition to Income2

SRI MAHESH GURRAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITTA/20/2024HC Andhra Pradesh22 Aug 2024

Bench: G.NARENDAR,KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

For Respondent: SRI VIJAY KUMAR PUNNA (STANDING
Section 12ASection 138Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 151Section 23Section 260

condoning the delay? Brief facts of the case are: 2. The assessee filed return of income admitting total taxable income at Rs.2,80,551/-, The return was processed under Section 143(1) of the Act. The assessment was completed and the Assessing Officer passed order under Section 143(3) of the Act, dated 21.03.2014, assessing the total income

THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI KOUNDINYA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY

ITTA/179/2019HC Andhra Pradesh29 Oct 2019

Bench: C.PRAVEEN KUMAR,CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

2 Ch. 149 at 170-171, Court of Appeal (England and Wales) 41 [1983] UKHL 1, [1983] 2 A.C. 237, H.L. (UK) 42 [1985] A.C. 374, H.L. (U.K) 43 [2001] Q.B. 213, C.A (England & Wales) CJ, MSM,J and DVSS,J W.P.Nos.13203 of 2020 & batch 62 expectations.(Nadarajah v. Secretary of State for the Home Department44). 99) A procedural

THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S.BOMMIDALA ENTERPIRSES (P) LTD

Appeal is dismissed

ITTA/216/2018HC Andhra Pradesh20 Aug 2025

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench, Visakhapatnam, Preferred Against The Order Of The Income Tax (Appeals)-I, Guntur, Dated 29.01.2016 Bearing Appeal No.4/Cit(A)-1/Gnt/2014-15, Which Was Preferred Against The Order Of The Additional Commissioner No. Ita Of Income Tax Range-1, Pan/Gir.No;Aaacb9064G/A.Y.2011-2012/Ito/Guntur, Dated Between; Guntur In 03.03.2014. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Guntur. ...Appellant/Appellant & M/S Bommidala Enterprises (P) Ltd., D.No.8-24-53, Mangalagiri Road Guntur. ...Respondent/Respondent

For Respondent: SRI DUNDU MANMOHAN
Section 151Section 260A

Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 236 days in representing the I.T.T.Aand to pass. Counsel for the Appellant: 1.ELEVATED AS JUDGE Counsel for the Respondent: 1.DUNDU MANMOHAN The Court made the following: 2

THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. M/S.BOMMIDALA ENTERPRISES(P) LTD

Appeal is dismissed

ITTA/82/2018HC Andhra Pradesh20 Aug 2025

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench, Visakhapatnam, Preferred Against The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Guntur, Dated 30.03.2012 Bearing Appeal No. Ita No.0320, 0319 & 0279/Cit(A)/Gnt/2011-12, Which Was Preferred Against The Order Of The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-2, Guntur Pan/Gir.No: In Aaacb9064G/A.Y.2009-2010/Ito/Guntur, Dated 30.12.2011. Between: The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Guntur ...Appellant/Respondent & M/S Bommidala Enterprises (P) Ltd, D.No. 8-24-53, Mangalagiri Road Guntur ...Respondent/Appellant

For Respondent: Sri Dundu Manmohan
Section 151Section 260A

Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 174 days in representing the ITTA and to pass Counsel for the Appellant: 1.ELE Counsel for the Respondent: 1.DUNDU MANMOHAN The Court made the following: J f 2