BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 10(5)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai2,611Mumbai2,459Delhi2,221Kolkata1,467Pune1,337Bangalore1,257Hyderabad920Ahmedabad819Jaipur736Surat426Chandigarh418Raipur360Nagpur354Visakhapatnam310Indore303Amritsar271Lucknow271Karnataka254Cochin247Rajkot233Cuttack174Patna152Panaji136Agra79Calcutta67Guwahati66Dehradun60SC56Jodhpur53Allahabad42Telangana38Varanasi32Jabalpur31Ranchi23Rajasthan9Orissa7Kerala7Punjab & Haryana5Himachal Pradesh4Andhra Pradesh3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Gauhati1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1R.M. LODHA ANIL R. DAVE1DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1

Key Topics

Section 1512Condonation of Delay2

M/S MERIDIAN PROMOTERS (P) lTD., vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result, the Appeal is allowed and the order, dated 26

ITTA/157/2019HC Andhra Pradesh17 Oct 2019

Bench: The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeal) In Ita.No.0782/Cc-2,Vizag/Cit(A)-

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 260A

Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The concept of such a liberal approach cannot be equated with doing injustice to the other party. The Court cannot condone delay in a case, where the Court concludes that there is no justification for the delay. The discretion has to be exercised within the MSRM, J & JUD,J ITTA_157_2019 6 reasonable

SANTOSHKUMAR GUPTA vs. INCOMETAX OFFICER

Accordingly, I.A.No.01 of 2025 is dismissed

ITTA/32/2025
HC Andhra Pradesh
26 Jan 2026

Bench: R RAGHUNANDAN RAO,T.C.D.SEKHAR

For Appellant: 1. B V S CHALAPATI RAOFor Respondent: 1. Y N VIVEKANANDA
Section 151

Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay 153 days in representing the instant Petition bearing SR.No.35777 of 2024, dated 14.10.2024 and pass Counsel for the Appellant: 1. B V S CHALAPATI RAO Counsel for the Respondent

THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI KOUNDINYA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY

ITTA/179/2019HC Andhra Pradesh29 Oct 2019

Bench: C.PRAVEEN KUMAR,CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

5. The assumption may be of fact or law, present or future. That is to say it may be about the present or future existence of a fact or state of affairs (including the state of the law or the existence of a legal right, interest or relationship or the content of future conduct). 6. The doctrine should be seen