BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 10(34)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai777Delhi700Mumbai557Kolkata339Pune253Bangalore220Surat201Hyderabad195Ahmedabad193Jaipur161Karnataka145Indore135Chandigarh121Raipur114Amritsar111Nagpur103Visakhapatnam80Panaji77Cochin67Lucknow65Cuttack56Calcutta38Rajkot36Jodhpur35SC28Varanasi19Telangana17Patna17Allahabad14Guwahati10Jabalpur8Dehradun6Rajasthan6Agra3Orissa3Andhra Pradesh2Ranchi1Himachal Pradesh1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Kerala1

M/S MERIDIAN PROMOTERS (P) lTD., vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result, the Appeal is allowed and the order, dated 26

ITTA/157/2019HC Andhra Pradesh17 Oct 2019

Bench: The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeal) In Ita.No.0782/Cc-2,Vizag/Cit(A)-

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 260A

34,014/- is not right in law. The Tribunal ought to have considered that the disallowance of 25% of the labor chares is not right in law. There was no gross negligence on the part of the assessee. There was no mala fide intention on the part of the assessee in not preferring the appeal within the period of limitation

THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI KOUNDINYA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY

ITTA/179/2019HC Andhra Pradesh29 Oct 2019

Bench: C.PRAVEEN KUMAR,CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

10 ER 868 (PC) CJ, MSM,J and DVSS,J W.P.Nos.13203 of 2020 & batch 81 (referred supra) which applies where two parties stand together in a contractual or other similar legal relationship, and one of them makes to the others promise to forbear from enforcing its strict legal rights. To this situation the rule in Jorden v. Money (referred