BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 18clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai776Delhi774Karnataka545Chennai392Bangalore376Pune222Jaipur206Ahmedabad197Kolkata142Hyderabad142Chandigarh88Lucknow65Indore56Cochin53Amritsar50Cuttack37Rajkot37Nagpur35Visakhapatnam35Allahabad32Raipur28Agra24Surat22Telangana22Calcutta18Patna16SC14Jodhpur14Panaji14Varanasi10Kerala9Rajasthan7Punjab & Haryana6Ranchi6Dehradun4Jabalpur3Andhra Pradesh2Guwahati2Himachal Pradesh2Orissa1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 115

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, HYD vs. CARGO HANDLING PRIVATE WORKERS POOL, VISAKHAPATNAM

Accordingly, the I.T.T.A. is dismissed

ITTA/14/2017HC Andhra Pradesh15 Sept 2022

Bench: C.PRAVEEN KUMAR,TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

Section 11Section 11(5)Section 13(1)(c)Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 260

18 activities, as they are integral to the charity / charitable activity. The wages and fees payable by the users and shipping companies are fixed by the Dock Labour Board and collected accordingly. The Trustees are not entitled for any remuneration/profit except reimbursement of expenses incurred by them on behalf of the Trust in terms of Clause 16 of the Trust

THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI KOUNDINYA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY

ITTA/179/2019HC Andhra Pradesh29 Oct 2019

Bench: C.PRAVEEN KUMAR,CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

18, C.A. (England & Wales) CJ, MSM,J and DVSS,J W.P.Nos.13203 of 2020 & batch 66 104) Lastly, Sri M.S. Prasad, learned counsel also placed reliance on the judgment of the Apex Court in Manuelsons Hotels (P) Limited vs. State of Kerala46, wherein it is held that, in fact, we must never forget that the doctrine of promissory estoppel