BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “capital gains”+ Section 49clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,434Delhi1,940Bangalore798Chennai546Kolkata420Ahmedabad356Jaipur330Hyderabad229Chandigarh164Indore102Pune97Cochin88Raipur87Nagpur70Calcutta60Karnataka57Lucknow51Rajkot46Surat42SC34Visakhapatnam31Guwahati24Amritsar22Telangana22Cuttack22Patna13Jodhpur13Jabalpur11Kerala8Varanasi7Agra6Dehradun6Rajasthan5Allahabad5Ranchi3Orissa2Andhra Pradesh2K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Himachal Pradesh1Panaji1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 115

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, HYD vs. CARGO HANDLING PRIVATE WORKERS POOL, VISAKHAPATNAM

Accordingly, the I.T.T.A. is dismissed

ITTA/14/2017HC Andhra Pradesh15 Sept 2022

Bench: C.PRAVEEN KUMAR,TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

Section 11Section 11(5)Section 13(1)(c)Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 260

49,41,738 /-. 4. Assailing the Assessment Order, Appeal vide I.T.A. No.525/Vizag/2014 came to be filed. After hearing the Assessee, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Visakhapatnam, passed an Order, which reads as under: “26.2. I have perused the details filed. It is seen that amount of Rs.1,77,339/-, Rs.2,30,051/- and Rs.2,05,462/- were collected towards

THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI KOUNDINYA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY

ITTA/179/2019HC Andhra Pradesh29 Oct 2019

Bench: C.PRAVEEN KUMAR,CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

capital region for pooling their land by applying the principle of Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation. 102) A legitimate expectation does not arise when it is made ultra vires of the decision-maker's statutory powers, that is, when the decision-maker lacked legal power to make the representation. Courts are reluctant to protect such an expectation that has been created