BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “capital gains”+ Section 4clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai8,385Delhi6,252Chennai2,571Bangalore2,556Kolkata1,950Ahmedabad1,151Jaipur822Hyderabad770Pune682Surat530Karnataka508Indore438Chandigarh364Cochin246Nagpur224Rajkot204Raipur190Visakhapatnam173Lucknow157Calcutta120Telangana106Amritsar105SC102Cuttack97Patna94Dehradun81Agra77Panaji74Guwahati61Jodhpur57Ranchi56Jabalpur45Allahabad24Kerala22Varanasi16Rajasthan11Orissa9Punjab & Haryana9A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Himachal Pradesh2Gauhati2Andhra Pradesh2ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1

Key Topics

Section 115

THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI KOUNDINYA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY

ITTA/179/2019HC Andhra Pradesh29 Oct 2019

Bench: C.PRAVEEN KUMAR,CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

capital region for pooling their land by applying the principle of Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation. 102) A legitimate expectation does not arise when it is made ultra vires of the decision-maker's statutory powers, that is, when the decision-maker lacked legal power to make the representation. Courts are reluctant to protect such an expectation that has been created

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, HYD vs. CARGO HANDLING PRIVATE WORKERS POOL, VISAKHAPATNAM

Accordingly, the I.T.T.A. is dismissed

ITTA/14/2017HC Andhra Pradesh15 Sept 2022

Bench: C.PRAVEEN KUMAR,TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

Section 11Section 11(5)Section 13(1)(c)
Section 143(1)
Section 147
Section 148
Section 260

4 (1975) 101 ITR 234 (SC) 17 The difficult question, however, still remains: what is the meaning of "charitable purpose" which is only indicated but not defined by Section 2(15) of the Act? It seems to me that a common concept or element of "charity" is shared by each of the four different categories of charity. It is true