BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “capital gains”+ Business Incomeclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai5,592Delhi4,136Chennai1,772Bangalore1,756Kolkata1,264Ahmedabad759Jaipur600Hyderabad555Pune439Chandigarh244Indore219Cochin184Raipur148Nagpur144Surat117Rajkot110Lucknow103SC94Visakhapatnam93Amritsar74Panaji60Dehradun58Karnataka57Calcutta50Cuttack41Jodhpur35Guwahati34Patna32Agra26Kerala16Jabalpur15Ranchi13Telangana13Allahabad12Rajasthan11Orissa8Varanasi7Punjab & Haryana7Andhra Pradesh2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Gauhati1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Himachal Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 115

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, HYD vs. CARGO HANDLING PRIVATE WORKERS POOL, VISAKHAPATNAM

Accordingly, the I.T.T.A. is dismissed

ITTA/14/2017HC Andhra Pradesh15 Sept 2022

Bench: C.PRAVEEN KUMAR,TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

Section 11Section 11(5)Section 13(1)(c)Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 260

gain, which determines that it is charitable. This direction must be evident and obligatory upon the trustee from the terms of a deed of trust before it can be held to be really charitable.” 22. Similar such view was taken by the Delhi High Court in GS1 India V. Director General of Income-Tax (Exemption) and Another5. Applying the principles

THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI KOUNDINYA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY

ITTA/179/2019HC Andhra Pradesh29 Oct 2019

Bench: C.PRAVEEN KUMAR,CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

capital region for pooling their land by applying the principle of Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation. 102) A legitimate expectation does not arise when it is made ultra vires of the decision-maker's statutory powers, that is, when the decision-maker lacked legal power to make the representation. Courts are reluctant to protect such an expectation that has been created