BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “capital gains”+ Addition to Incomeclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai6,720Delhi5,567Chennai2,161Bangalore2,138Kolkata1,751Ahmedabad1,150Jaipur806Hyderabad782Pune714Chandigarh377Indore356Surat260Cochin230Nagpur205Raipur202Visakhapatnam151Rajkot151Lucknow150Amritsar105Agra90Patna87SC75Panaji71Dehradun67Guwahati59Calcutta58Cuttack57Karnataka53Jodhpur50Ranchi39Jabalpur38Allahabad23Kerala16Telangana11Varanasi10Rajasthan9Orissa7Punjab & Haryana6Andhra Pradesh2Gauhati2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1

Key Topics

Section 115

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, HYD vs. CARGO HANDLING PRIVATE WORKERS POOL, VISAKHAPATNAM

Accordingly, the I.T.T.A. is dismissed

ITTA/14/2017HC Andhra Pradesh15 Sept 2022

Bench: C.PRAVEEN KUMAR,TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

Section 11Section 11(5)Section 13(1)(c)Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 260

addition confirmed for assessment year 2007-08 is the net receipt of Rs.5,137/-. For statistical purpose, these grounds of appeal may be taken as dismissed. 27. In the result, the appeals for the assessment years 1997- 98, 1998-99, 2005-06, 2006-07 and 2007-08 of the appellant are partly allowed.” 5. Aggrieved by the decision

THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI KOUNDINYA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY

ITTA/179/2019HC Andhra Pradesh29 Oct 2019

Bench: C.PRAVEEN KUMAR,CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

capital region for pooling their land by applying the principle of Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation. 102) A legitimate expectation does not arise when it is made ultra vires of the decision-maker's statutory powers, that is, when the decision-maker lacked legal power to make the representation. Courts are reluctant to protect such an expectation that has been created