BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 96clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,468Delhi1,429Bangalore641Karnataka315Chennai308Ahmedabad291Kolkata259Hyderabad232Jaipur179Pune128Chandigarh117Cochin107Indore92Calcutta51Surat50Visakhapatnam44Raipur33Cuttack31Agra26Lucknow24Rajkot20SC19Telangana17Nagpur16Jodhpur11Amritsar5Rajasthan4Dehradun4Allahabad3Guwahati3Orissa2Kerala2Panaji2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Andhra Pradesh1Patna1Punjab & Haryana1Ranchi1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 80I11Section 809Section 143(3)6Section 132(4)4Addition to Income4Section 92C3Section 1483Bogus/Accommodation Entry3Bogus Purchases

SATIA INDUSTRIES LIMITED,MUKTSAR vs. DCIT/ACIT CIRCLE I, BATHINDA, BATHINDA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 702/ASR/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar16 Dec 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. Rohit Kapoor, Adv. &
Section 143(3)Section 144C(1)Section 144C(2)Section 144C(5)Section 80Section 80GSection 80ISection 92C

transfer, in either case, had been made at the 97market value of such goods 96[or services] as on that date : Provided that where, in the opinion of the Assessing Officer, the computation of the profits and gains of the eligible business in the manner hereinbefore specified presents 15 I.T.A. No. 702/Asr/2024 Assessment Year: 2021-22 exceptional difficulties, the Assessing

3
Section 1322
Deduction2

THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S KAISER INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD, SAMBA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 381/ASR/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar20 Mar 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Sh. N. S. Saini & Sh. N. K. Choudhryita No. 381/Asr./2016 : Asstt. Year : 2006-07 Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Vs M/S Kaiser Industries Pvt. Ltd., Tax, Circle-1, Jammu Industrial Growth Centre, Sidco, Samba (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabck0456G Assessee By : Shri. Vasu Gupta, Ca Revenue By : Sh. Yashender Garg, Dr Date Of Hearing :21.02.2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 22.03.2019 Order Per N. S. Saini: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Revenue Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Jammu Dated 31.03.2016. 2. The Sole Issue Involved In This Appeal Is That The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Erred In Allowing The Deduction U/S 80Ib(4) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 In Respect Of Samba Unit As The Same Was Claimed To Inflate The Profit Of Eligible Unit For The Motive Of Availing Deduction U/S 80Ib.

For Appellant: Shri. Vasu Gupta, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Yashender Garg, DR
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 80Section 80I

transferred to Samba unit from Bhadurgarh unit are at the same rate at which Bhadurgarh unit shall be able to sell it to outsiders. Since these are excisable items as such variation in rate cannot be made. Further, the purchase price of raw material as procured from Bhadurgarh unit which constitutes only 37.52% as submitted earlier, are at purchase rates

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR vs. M/S PUNJAB RICE LAND PRIVATE LIMITED , TARN TARAN

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and

ITA 44/ASR/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar15 Nov 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Jatinder Nagpal, Adv. & Sh. Nimish Nagpal, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Rohit Mehra, CIT DR
Section 132(4)

96,804/- and added to the income of the assesse for the assessment year 2012-13, holding that the assessee has taken accommodation entry against these bogus purchases without actual delivery of goods as being unsubstantiated. 7. The aggrieved assessee went before the Ld. CIT(A) who has granted part relief to the assesse on merits by observing as under

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR vs. M/S PUNJAB RICE LAND PRIVATE LIMITED, TARN TARAN

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and

ITA 45/ASR/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar15 Nov 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Jatinder Nagpal, Adv. & Sh. Nimish Nagpal, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Rohit Mehra, CIT DR
Section 132(4)

96,804/- and added to the income of the assesse for the assessment year 2012-13, holding that the assessee has taken accommodation entry against these bogus purchases without actual delivery of goods as being unsubstantiated. 7. The aggrieved assessee went before the Ld. CIT(A) who has granted part relief to the assesse on merits by observing as under

NASA AGRO INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED,FAZILKA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-II, BATHINDA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 236/ASR/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar26 Sept 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. Y. K. Sud & Sh. P. K. Anand, CAs
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 153cSection 250

transferred by the assessee to the M/s Devinder Kumar Deepesh Kumar ,as an accommodation entry for recording of bogus purchase, because 4 I.T.A. No. 236/Asr/2023 Assessment Year: 2011-12 as per the AO the physical movement of goods could not be proved, in absence of any Bilty, weighment slip of goods, octroi receipts, and in absence of any proof