Search: transfer pricing

1 result for “transfer pricing”+ Section 801A(3)(ii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai85 Delhi41 Ahmedabad25 Kolkata23 Chennai15 Hyderabad12 Jaipur10 Cuttack10 Rajkot8 Indore7 Jodhpur4 Dehradun2 Bangalore2 Nagpur2 Pune2 Amritsar1 Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 92C3 Section 80I3

SATIA INDUSTRIES LIMITED,MUKTSAR vs. DCIT/ACIT CIRCLE I, BATHINDA, BATHINDA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 702/ASR/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar16 Dec 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. Rohit Kapoor, Adv. &

Section 143(3)Section 144C(1)Section 144C(2)Section 144C(5)Section 80Section 80GSection 80ISection 92C

ii. There was no justification for reducing distribution loss, transmission loss, or cross- subsidy charges; rather, these components were required to be added. iii. The base rate of 6.19 per unit adopted by the TPO was incorrect; the correct base rate was 6.41, and further, KVAH required conversion into KWH by applying the power factor of 0.92. Thus, the appellant