THE DY. COMMISSIONER INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S. HORIZON BUILDCON PVT. LTD,, JAMMU

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue in I

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

price bargained for by the parties to the sale, etc. The consideration for the transfer of the capital asset is what the transferor receives Dy. CIT v. Horizon Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. in lieu of the asset he parts with, viz., money or money's worth. The expression "full consideration" in the main part of section 12B(2) cannot be construed

POONAM MARWAHA,AMRITSAR vs. ACIT DCIT CEN CIR, AMRITSAR

Bench: Sh. Vikram Singh Yadav & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

price. The correct value of excess stock as per cost as submitted before the AO is worked out and the assessee has put an alternate argument to demonstrate that the revenue is not prejudiced: “Additional argument on the aspect of prejudicial to the interest of revenue: That the appellant vide reply dated 17.03.2021 specifically requested the AO to consider