BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 224clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi608Mumbai252Karnataka246Bangalore127Ahmedabad65Chennai62Jaipur53Indore39Chandigarh32Cochin27Hyderabad26Kolkata25Pune23Lucknow19Calcutta16Surat11Rajkot10Dehradun9SC7Allahabad5Nagpur4Varanasi4Raipur4Telangana3Rajasthan3Amritsar2Visakhapatnam1Agra1Andhra Pradesh1Cuttack1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

Key Topics

Section 26316Section 271D8Section 269S6Penalty2Condonation of Delay2

SH. MANJIT KRISHAN MALHOTRA,ABOHAR vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCME TAX , BATHINDA

The appeals of the assessee are disposed of in the terms indicated as above

ITA 39/ASR/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Aug 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Anil Puri, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Chandrajit Singh, CIT DR
Section 263Section 269SSection 271D

224 ITR 233 (MP) distinguished. (Paras 7 & 11 to 14) Conclusion : Scope and ambit of a proceeding for rectification of an order under s. 154 and a proceeding for revision under s. 263 are distinct and different; revisional authority is not denuded of its revisional jurisdiction under s. 263 merely because an order of assessment has undergone rectification

SHRI. MANJIT KRISHAN MALHOTRA,ABOHAR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BATHINDA

The appeals of the assessee are disposed of in the terms indicated as above

ITA 40/ASR/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Aug 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Anil Puri, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Chandrajit Singh, CIT DR
Section 263Section 269SSection 271D

224 ITR 233 (MP) distinguished. (Paras 7 & 11 to 14) Conclusion : Scope and ambit of a proceeding for rectification of an order under s. 154 and a proceeding for revision under s. 263 are distinct and different; revisional authority is not denuded of its revisional jurisdiction under s. 263 merely because an order of assessment has undergone rectification