Search: transfer pricing

3 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 160clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai253 Delhi205 Chennai72 Chandigarh66 Ahmedabad60 Cochin59 Jaipur57 Rajkot36 Bangalore34 Hyderabad33 Kolkata27 Raipur20 Nagpur18 Pune18 Indore16 Visakhapatnam12 Lucknow10 Surat6 Amritsar3 Cuttack3 Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 686 Section 1325 Section 1474 Section 250(6)3 Addition to Income3 Section 1442 Section 144r2 Section 1512 Section 10(38)2

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL CIRCLE), JAMMU vs. ANITA KAPAHI, JAMMU

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed being devoid of merits

ITA 557/ASR/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar29 May 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Sh. Udayan Dasgupta & Sh. Krinwant Sahay

For Appellant: Sh. P. N. Arora, Adv

Section 131Section 132Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 250(6)Section 69

section 69, on basis of uncertified copy of an agreement to sell was not justified Further, the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Smt. Rashmi Rajiv Mehta reported in [2024] 160 taxmann.com 723 (Delhi) has held as under: Assessing Officer based on said information issued reopening notice and made addition

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL CIRCLE), JAMMU vs. ANITA KAPAHI, JAMMU

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL CIRCLE), JAMMU vs. ANITA KAPAHI, JAMMU

SMT. SATYAWATI MARWAHA THROUGH LEGAL HEIR SH, CHANDER SHEIKHAR MARWAHA,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

SMT. SATYAWATI MARWAHA THROUGH LEGAL HEIR SH. CHANDER SHEIKHAR MARWAHA,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR