Search: transfer pricing

3 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 144Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 143(3)5 Section 69C3 Section 92C3 Section 80I3 Section 803 Addition to Income3 Section 144C(5)2 Section 144C(13)2 Deduction2

SATIA INDUSTRIES LIMITED,MUKTSAR, PUNJAB vs. DCIT, ACIT CIRCLE 1, BATHINDA

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed

ITA 527/ASR/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar28 Feb 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Udayan Das Gupta & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 527/Asr/2024 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2020-21

For Appellant: S/Shri Sudhir SehgalFor Respondent: Shri K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT DR

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 144C(5)Section 80

Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) of Rs. 5.98 per unit of PSPCL for deriving average was not justified, as the assessee is categorized as a power-intensive unit, and not under the general category. This issue has also been accepted 527-Asr-2024 Satia Industries, Muktsar 13 by the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) in its order passed under Section 144C

SATIA INDUSTRIES LIMITED,MUKTSAR, PUNJAB vs. DCIT, ACIT CIRCLE 1, BATHINDA

SATIA INDUSTRIES LIMITED,MUKTSAR, PUNJAB vs. DCIT, ACIT CIRCLE 1, BATHINDA

SATIA INDUSTRIES LIMITED,MUKTSAR vs. DCIT/ACIT CIRCLE I, BATHINDA, BATHINDA

M/S. SATIA INDUSTRIES LIMITED,MUKTSAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, BATHINDA