SATIA INDUSTRIES LIMITED,MUKTSAR, PUNJAB vs. DCIT, ACIT CIRCLE 1, BATHINDA
In the result, the appeal is partly allowed
ITA 527/ASR/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar28 Feb 2025AY 2020-21
Bench: Shri Udayan Das Gupta & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 527/Asr/2024 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2020-21
For Appellant: S/Shri Sudhir SehgalFor Respondent: Shri K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 144C(5)Section 80
section 80-IA(8) of the Income Tax Act,1961. 4. That the AO on directions of DRP has erred in confirming arm's length price of power [transferred from specified to non-specified unit] computed by TPO at 3.875 per unit against 6.73 taken by the assessee. That DRP has erred in confirming action of the TPO in adopting