SATIA INDUSTRIES LIMITED,MUKTSAR, PUNJAB vs. DCIT, ACIT CIRCLE 1, BATHINDA
In the result, the appeal is partly allowed
ITA 527/ASR/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar28 Feb 2025AY 2020-21
Bench: Shri Udayan Das Gupta & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 527/Asr/2024 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2020-21
For Appellant: S/Shri Sudhir SehgalFor Respondent: Shri K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 144C(5)Section 80
68,26,820/- by applying
63.79% of total cost incurred. That the DRP has erred in rejecting the value o' power considered by the assessee on the basis TNM method at Rs 47,97,24,111/-and confirming addition of Rs 12,28,97,957/-.
6. The AO on the directions of DRP had erred both in fact
