Search: section 68

6 results for “section 68”+ Section 248clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 14710 Section 26310 Section 143(3)9 Section 1486 Section 80I4 Addition to Income3 Section 1512 Section 148(1)2 Section 1492 Reassessment

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, JAMMU vs. M/S MOHD ASRAF SHEIKH, JAMMU

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed

ITA 212/ASR/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar26 Jul 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Vinay Jamwal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Ratinder Kaur, Sr. DR

Section 68

68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to the return income of the assessee. 4. The assesse being aggrieved with the Assessment Order, went in appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) who has granted relief to the assessee by observing as under: “4. In the appellate proceedings, the appellant, through his Authorized Representative reiterated the arguments made before

M/S BLUE CITY TOWNSHIP & COLONIZERS,AMRITSAR. vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,, AMRITSAR.

ITA 90/ASR/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, JAMMU vs. M/S MOHD ASRAF SHEIKH, JAMMU

M/S BLUE CITY TOWNSHIP & COLONIZERS,AMRITSAR. vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,, AMRITSAR.

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, JAMMU vs. M/S MOHD ASRAF SHEIKH, JAMMU

M/S BLUE CITY TOWNSHIP & COLONIZERS,AMRITSAR. vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,, AMRITSAR.

LATE SMT. MOHINI PURI THROUGH,JAMMU vs. THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER, JAMMU

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, SAMBA vs. SH. ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA, SAMBA

NARINDER AND COMPANY,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3(5), JALANDHAR

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(2), JALANDHAR, , CIVIL LINES vs. SH. BARJESH SINGHAL, MODERN COLONY