BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “section 68”+ Section 153Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi495Mumbai325Jaipur118Chennai115Hyderabad75Cochin71Bangalore70Chandigarh42Guwahati38Visakhapatnam29Pune27Patna26Allahabad21Ahmedabad16Agra12Dehradun10Nagpur9Surat9Indore9Lucknow8Karnataka7Raipur5Rajkot5Amritsar4Jodhpur4Cuttack3Kolkata3SC2Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 153A20Section 688Section 250(6)4Section 143(3)4Section 153B4Section 1424Section 145(3)4Section 1324Addition to Income4Search & Seizure

M/S. OHRI & BATRA SHOWBIZ PRIVATE LIMITED,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL-CIRCLE-II, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 232/ASR/2022[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 May 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 132Section 142Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 153ASection 153BSection 250(6)Section 68

153B (1) r.w. Explanation (ii)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 3. That the A.O had gravely erred in law and facts of the case in assuming jurisdiction and framing assessment in the hands of the assessee company. 4. That the A.O had acted in blatant violation of the basic 'Principles of Natural Justice' by proceeding with and framing

4
Natural Justice4
Condonation of Delay4

M/S OHRI & BATRA SHOWBIZ PRIVATE LIMITED,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 233/ASR/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 May 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 132Section 142Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 153ASection 153BSection 250(6)Section 68

153B (1) r.w. Explanation (ii)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 3. That the A.O had gravely erred in law and facts of the case in assuming jurisdiction and framing assessment in the hands of the assessee company. 4. That the A.O had acted in blatant violation of the basic 'Principles of Natural Justice' by proceeding with and framing

M/S. OHRI & BATRA SHOWBIZ PRIVATE LIMITED ,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 234/ASR/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 May 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 132Section 142Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 153ASection 153BSection 250(6)Section 68

153B (1) r.w. Explanation (ii)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 3. That the A.O had gravely erred in law and facts of the case in assuming jurisdiction and framing assessment in the hands of the assessee company. 4. That the A.O had acted in blatant violation of the basic 'Principles of Natural Justice' by proceeding with and framing

M/S. OHRI & BATRA SHOWBIZ PRIVATE LIMITED,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 235/ASR/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 May 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 132Section 142Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 153ASection 153BSection 250(6)Section 68

153B (1) r.w. Explanation (ii)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 3. That the A.O had gravely erred in law and facts of the case in assuming jurisdiction and framing assessment in the hands of the assessee company. 4. That the A.O had acted in blatant violation of the basic 'Principles of Natural Justice' by proceeding with and framing