Search: section 68

9 results for “section 68”+ Section 144Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 6813 Section 14713 Section 25011 Section 14810 Addition to Income9 Section 143(3)6 Section 1444 Section 144B3 Cash Deposit3 Section 142(1)

SHRI RAVINDER SACHDEVA,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD -5 (4), AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeal of the assesse is allowed for statistical

ITA 263/ASR/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar20 Jun 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Shri. P.N. Arora, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Pardeep Kumar, Sr. DR

Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 234ASection 68

68 of the Act. Under the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the considered view that the authorities below ought to have disproved the claim of the assesse by way of rebutting its contention with support of corroborative documentary evidences on record after granting an adequate opportunity of being heard. 11. The Hon’ble Supreme Court

SHRI RAVINDER SACHDEVA,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD -5 (4), AMRITSAR

SHRI RAVINDER SACHDEVA,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD -5 (4), AMRITSAR

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. M/S JASDEEP KAUR CHADHA, JALANDHAR

JASDEEP KAUR CHADHA-JALANDHAR,PUNJAB vs. JAO THE DCIT CIRCLE-4 JALANDHAR, PUNJAB

NEERAJ KUMAR SETHI,DELHI vs. ITO, NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE (NFAC)

RANA IQBAL SINGH,V. DOSANJH KALAN, PHILLAUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, PHAGWARA

PANKAJ JINDAL CONTRACTOR,MANSA vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-I, BATHINDA, BATHINDA

MOHAMMAD MUZAMIL MUSHTAQ WANI,KULGAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOMETAX DEPARTMENT

SHRI ABDUL RASHID BUTT,KISHTWAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-I, JAMMU

SANGAM TRADERS 60-GOLDEN AVENUE SAILI ROAD PATHANKOT,PATHANKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 PATHANKOT SAILI ROAD PATHANKOT, PATHANKOT