BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “section 68”+ Section 144Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi91Mumbai70Chennai62Kolkata24Allahabad21Pune19Bangalore17Indore16Jaipur16Lucknow14Patna11Chandigarh10Nagpur10Surat9Hyderabad9Raipur9Visakhapatnam8Ahmedabad7Agra5Cuttack4Amritsar3Cochin2Karnataka2Rajkot1Orissa1SC1

Key Topics

Section 14810Section 80I4Section 250(6)3Section 143(3)3Addition to Income3Section 133(6)2Reassessment2Reopening of Assessment2

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, SAMBA vs. SH. ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA, SAMBA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue in Ground nos

ITA 475/ASR/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar17 Jul 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjeei.T.A. No.475/Asr/2016 Assessment Year: 2013-14

Section 143(3)Section 250(6)Section 40Section 80I

144A of the Act. The ld. AO then provided the assessee a final opportunity to produce documents/bills/vouchers/books of account on30.03.2016 in support of the expenses claimed in the return of income filed. In response to that the assessee submitted a letter on 30.03.2016 "that reply to the points 1-9 was already given on 11.03.2016 and requested

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, BATHINDA vs. DMR BUILDERS PVT LTD, BATHINDA

In the result the appeal of the revenue is dismissed being devoid of merits

ITA 292/ASR/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar16 Jun 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta(Hybrid Hearing) I.T.A. Nos. 292 & 293/Asr/2024 Assessment Years: 2016-17 & 2017-18

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 250(6)

68 of the Act for the assessment year 2016-17. 5. In view of the above facts, I have reasons to believe that amounts of Rs. 5,71,37,870/- , which was chargeable to tax in the case of the assessee for the assessment year 2016- 17 has escaped assessment within the meaning of section

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, BATHINDA vs. DMR BUILDERS PVT LTD, BATHINDA

In the result the appeal of the revenue is dismissed being devoid of merits

ITA 293/ASR/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar16 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta(Hybrid Hearing) I.T.A. Nos. 292 & 293/Asr/2024 Assessment Years: 2016-17 & 2017-18

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 250(6)

68 of the Act for the assessment year 2016-17. 5. In view of the above facts, I have reasons to believe that amounts of Rs. 5,71,37,870/- , which was chargeable to tax in the case of the assessee for the assessment year 2016- 17 has escaped assessment within the meaning of section