Search: reassessment u/s 147

6 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 292clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 14816 Section 143(3)7 Addition to Income6 Reopening of Assessment4 Section 250(6)3 Section 143(2)3 Reassessment3 Section 133(6)2 Section 10(38)

SHRIMATI MANJIT KAUR,BATHINDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2 (1), BATHINDA

In the result, both the appeals are disposed off in the terms indicated as above

ITA 147/ASR/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Aug 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. J. K. Gupta, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. S. M. Surendranath, Sr. DR

Section 148Section 69A

u/s 148 was issued on 21.03.2016 to the assessee through the registered post Manjit Kaur & Baljinder Singh v. ITO and it was not served upon the assessee and the service of notice is preconditioned for validity of the reassessment proceedings. It is noted that the Assessing Officer issued notice under section 148 of Income Tax Act send through registered post

SHRI BALJINDER SINGH ,BATHINDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1), BATHINDA

In the result, both the appeals are disposed off in the terms indicated as above

SHRIMATI MANJIT KAUR,BATHINDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2 (1), BATHINDA

SHRI BALJINDER SINGH ,BATHINDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1), BATHINDA

SHRIMATI MANJIT KAUR,BATHINDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2 (1), BATHINDA

SHRI BALJINDER SINGH ,BATHINDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1), BATHINDA

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, BATHINDA vs. DMR BUILDERS PVT LTD, BATHINDA

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, BATHINDA vs. DMR BUILDERS PVT LTD, BATHINDA

SH GAUTAM SETH,BATALA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, BATALA

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD -2 (1), AMRITSAR vs. MS. SAVITA BANSAL, THROUGH LEGAL HEIR SH. PARVEEN KUMAR BANSAL, AMRITSAR