Search: reassessment u/s 147

3 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 271Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur33 Delhi27 Mumbai23 Pune19 Chennai14 Hyderabad10 Agra9 Kolkata8 Indore7 Amritsar3 Bangalore3 Nagpur3 Surat2 Chandigarh2 Raipur2 SC1 Patna1

Key Topics

Section 26316 Section 271D8 Section 269S6 Section 142(1)3 Penalty2 Condonation of Delay2

SHRI. MANJIT KRISHAN MALHOTRA,ABOHAR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BATHINDA

The appeals of the assessee are disposed of in the terms indicated as above

ITA 40/ASR/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Aug 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Anil Puri, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Chandrajit Singh, CIT DR

Section 263Section 269SSection 271D

u/s 171D and 271E passed by the JCIT, Bathinda, wherein as per the section 271D and 271E, the JCIT is categorically empowered for the penalty performance, being the quasi judicial action; that the Ld. PCIT while cancelling the penalty order, passed Manjit Krishan Malhotra v. Pr.CIT under section 271D and 271E, dated 10.02.2014, by the Jt. Commissioner of Income

SHRI. MANJIT KRISHAN MALHOTRA,ABOHAR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BATHINDA

SH. MANJIT KRISHAN MALHOTRA,ABOHAR vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCME TAX , BATHINDA

SHRI. MANJIT KRISHAN MALHOTRA,ABOHAR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BATHINDA

SH. MANJIT KRISHAN MALHOTRA,ABOHAR vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCME TAX , BATHINDA

GURPAL SINGH SIDHU,NEAR GOVT SCHOOL vs. ITO WARD 1(2), BATHINDA, BATHINDA