BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 255(8)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai232Delhi210Jaipur62Chandigarh56Chennai47Bangalore39Ahmedabad30Kolkata25Telangana23Pune21Allahabad20Raipur19Guwahati17Hyderabad12Surat11Jodhpur10Indore9Cuttack8Visakhapatnam7Lucknow5Orissa4Cochin4Amritsar2Kerala2Nagpur2Karnataka1Patna1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 1488Section 1474Section 143(3)2Reopening of Assessment2

SH. VARINDER KUMAR SOUL,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3(2), JALANDHAR

ITA 451/ASR/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar16 Jan 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi.T.A. No. 451(Asr)/2017 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Pan: Cvips 5218R

For Appellant: Sh. Ashray Sarna (C.A.)For Respondent: Sh. Ghulam Mustafa (D. R.)
Section 139Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(2)

255 ITR 220 (P&H). Be that as it may, there is equally no doubt that the AO had a valid reason to believe escapement from assessment qua rental income. The same is sufficient for him to assume jurisdiction to reopen the assessment u/s. 147. No contention in its 4 ITA No.451 (Asr)/2017(A.Y.2012-13) Varinder Kumar Soul

SHRI ARNESH KUMAR SHAKAR EX. MLA,HOSHIARPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD, DASUYA

In the result, appeal of the assessee ITA No

ITA 6/ASR/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar26 Jul 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 54Section 54F

reassessment as well.” Hon'ble High Court of Punjab and Haryanain Vipin Khanna vs. CIT 255 ITR 220, the relevant paragraph is extracted as follows: - “14. In view of the above discussion, we are satisfied that the letter dated 30-7- 1998 issued by the Assessing Officer insofar as it relates to matters unconnected with the issue of depreciation