BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 251clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai313Delhi282Ahmedabad94Chennai85Jaipur85Bangalore75Chandigarh62Pune38Hyderabad38Kolkata36Rajkot28Surat25Lucknow23Nagpur22Telangana22Indore20Allahabad20Guwahati17Raipur16Patna10Panaji9Cuttack7Amritsar6Cochin6Agra5Jodhpur5Visakhapatnam5Jabalpur3Orissa2Karnataka2Ranchi1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 14711Section 14811Section 1448Reopening of Assessment6Addition to Income6Section 143(3)3Section 139(1)3Section 1323Section 80C

SHRIMATI AMARJIT KAUR W/O BUGAR SINGH,MANSA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(4), MANSA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1/ASR/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar26 Jul 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. S. M. Surendranath, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 148Section 251(2)Section 49

section 251(2) of the Income tax Act, 1961 which was not done. 9. That any other relief may kindly be granted to the assessee to whom she is found entitled at the time of hearing of appeal.” 2. This appeal is more than 5 years old and the Ld. AR for the appellant has taken adjournments either by filing

M/S CITI PLAZA,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , WARD 3(1), JALANDHAR

3
Section 683
Deduction3
Disallowance3

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 356/ASR/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar13 Sept 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 147Section 148Section 250

147 within the period prescribed under section 149 read with section 150 of the Act. We are fortified in our view by a decision of the Apex Court in the case of K. M. Sharma v. ITO [2002] 254 ITR 772 wherein the Apex Court had considered the amendment made in sub-section (1) of section

SHRI MOHAMMAD ABBAS ASHRAF,SRINAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD -1, SRINAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 207/ASR/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: None (Written submission)For Respondent: Sh. Yashender Garg, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 148Section 44A

u/s 148 of the Act were invalid, being reasons not sufficient to believe escapement of income, based on vague information. Further reliance is made on latest judgement Dinesh kumar Dalsangbhai Chaudhary Kankavati Society Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmcdabad) Appeal Number: ITA No. 452/Alid/20l9 dated of order 14/06/2023 In a landmark decision bv IT AT Ahmedabad. the Income Tax assessment made under

SHRI ARUN NARULA,FROZEPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

Appeals are disposed of in the terms and observation made as above

ITA 12/ASR/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 May 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 68Section 80C

section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Accordingly, he prayed that the assessment order passed by the AO on the basis of invalid reasons is without jurisdiction and hence 6 I.T.A. Nos. 12 to 14/Asr/2022 Arun Narula v. Asstt. CIT bad in law. He requested that the assessment may be quashed on validity of the reasons. In support

SHRI ARUN NARULA,FEROZEPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFD INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

Appeals are disposed of in the terms and observation made as above

ITA 13/ASR/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 May 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 68Section 80C

section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Accordingly, he prayed that the assessment order passed by the AO on the basis of invalid reasons is without jurisdiction and hence 6 I.T.A. Nos. 12 to 14/Asr/2022 Arun Narula v. Asstt. CIT bad in law. He requested that the assessment may be quashed on validity of the reasons. In support

SHRI ARUN NARULA ,FEROZEPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

Appeals are disposed of in the terms and observation made as above

ITA 14/ASR/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 May 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 68Section 80C

section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Accordingly, he prayed that the assessment order passed by the AO on the basis of invalid reasons is without jurisdiction and hence 6 I.T.A. Nos. 12 to 14/Asr/2022 Arun Narula v. Asstt. CIT bad in law. He requested that the assessment may be quashed on validity of the reasons. In support