SHRI BRIJINDERPAL SINGH BHULLAR,MOHALI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- 1 (3), BATHINDA

Accordingly, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Sh. Ravish Sood & Dr. M. L. Meena

reassessment, therefore, the same not having been so done by the A.O in the present case, rendered the assessment framed by him u/s 144 r.w.s 147, dated 18.03.2014 as invalid. 6. Per contra, the ld. Departmental representative (“D.R”, for short) supported the orders of the lower authorities. It was submitted by the ld. D.R, that as the A.O had validly

SAINIK CO OPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LIMITED,JAMMU AND KASHMIR vs. ITO WARD 1(1), JAMMU, JAMMU

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed on the legal issue as indicated above

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta(Hybrid Hearing) I.T.A. No. 698/Asr/2024 Assessment Year: 2013-14

reassessment proceedings dated 23rd May, 2023, passed u/s 147 rws 144 ( with 144B ) of the Act 61 , is not legally valid and the same is quashed. The arguments of the Ld. DR revolved around the decision of the Hon’ble 11) Apex court in the case of Union of India vs Ashis Agarwal [2022] dated

MAJOR SINGH,AMRITSAR. vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,, AMRITSAR.

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is partly allowed on the afore-said terms

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arorai.T.A. No. 426/Asr/2015 Assessment Year: 2005-06

147, in-as-much as the jurisdiction to assess gets assumed on the issue of the notice u/s. 148(1), and to pass a reassessment order on the service thereof (refer R.K. Upadhyaya (supra)). Section 143(2), in such a case, thus, is only toward provision of providing reasonable opportunity to the assessee to states it’s case where

SH. FARUKH JEHAN ZEB ,SRINAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, ANANT NAG

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

144 read with section 147 of the Income Tax Act is confirmed.” 8 Farukh Ahmad Zeb v. ITO 5. The Ld. AR for the appellant submitted that the Ld. CIT (Appeals) has erred in law and on facts by confirming the actions of the AO of additions made u/s 68 of the Act on the basis of unexplained credits found

THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AMRITSAR. vs. M/S KHOSLA INTERNATIONAL, BATALA

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi.T.A. No. 307/Asr/2016 Assessment Year: 2008-09

144 r/w s. 147. The jurisdiction to reassess being assumed on the issue of a valid notice u/s. 148, the notice u/s. 143(2) does not, it 10 Asst. CIT v. Khosla International may be appreciated, assume the status of a jurisdictional notice. The failure to issue a notice u/s. 143(2) in such a case would not invalidate

MEASAGE SAT KARTAR SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

144 of the Act by the then AO as the assessee remained non-cooperative throughout the assessment proceedings. The I.T.A. Nos. 22/Asr/2020 19 &33 Others assessment was completed by the then AO after examining the appraisal report along with seized documents/material and issues emanating from the return of income filed by the assessee. The major issues involved in this case

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR vs. M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

144 of the Act by the then AO as the assessee remained non-cooperative throughout the assessment proceedings. The I.T.A. Nos. 22/Asr/2020 19 &33 Others assessment was completed by the then AO after examining the appraisal report along with seized documents/material and issues emanating from the return of income filed by the assessee. The major issues involved in this case

MEASAGE SAT KARTAR SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

144 of the Act by the then AO as the assessee remained non-cooperative throughout the assessment proceedings. The I.T.A. Nos. 22/Asr/2020 19 &33 Others assessment was completed by the then AO after examining the appraisal report along with seized documents/material and issues emanating from the return of income filed by the assessee. The major issues involved in this case

M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHEMDABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

144 of the Act by the then AO as the assessee remained non-cooperative throughout the assessment proceedings. The I.T.A. Nos. 22/Asr/2020 19 &33 Others assessment was completed by the then AO after examining the appraisal report along with seized documents/material and issues emanating from the return of income filed by the assessee. The major issues involved in this case

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR vs. M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVTE LIMITED, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

144 of the Act by the then AO as the assessee remained non-cooperative throughout the assessment proceedings. The I.T.A. Nos. 22/Asr/2020 19 &33 Others assessment was completed by the then AO after examining the appraisal report along with seized documents/material and issues emanating from the return of income filed by the assessee. The major issues involved in this case

M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHEMDABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

144 of the Act by the then AO as the assessee remained non-cooperative throughout the assessment proceedings. The I.T.A. Nos. 22/Asr/2020 19 &33 Others assessment was completed by the then AO after examining the appraisal report along with seized documents/material and issues emanating from the return of income filed by the assessee. The major issues involved in this case

M/S NARULA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

144 of the Act by the then AO as the assessee remained non-cooperative throughout the assessment proceedings. The I.T.A. Nos. 22/Asr/2020 19 &33 Others assessment was completed by the then AO after examining the appraisal report along with seized documents/material and issues emanating from the return of income filed by the assessee. The major issues involved in this case

M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHEMDABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

144 of the Act by the then AO as the assessee remained non-cooperative throughout the assessment proceedings. The I.T.A. Nos. 22/Asr/2020 19 &33 Others assessment was completed by the then AO after examining the appraisal report along with seized documents/material and issues emanating from the return of income filed by the assessee. The major issues involved in this case

M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHEMDABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

144 of the Act by the then AO as the assessee remained non-cooperative throughout the assessment proceedings. The I.T.A. Nos. 22/Asr/2020 19 &33 Others assessment was completed by the then AO after examining the appraisal report along with seized documents/material and issues emanating from the return of income filed by the assessee. The major issues involved in this case

MEASAGE SAT KARTAR SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

144 of the Act by the then AO as the assessee remained non-cooperative throughout the assessment proceedings. The I.T.A. Nos. 22/Asr/2020 19 &33 Others assessment was completed by the then AO after examining the appraisal report along with seized documents/material and issues emanating from the return of income filed by the assessee. The major issues involved in this case

M/S NARULA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

144 of the Act by the then AO as the assessee remained non-cooperative throughout the assessment proceedings. The I.T.A. Nos. 22/Asr/2020 19 &33 Others assessment was completed by the then AO after examining the appraisal report along with seized documents/material and issues emanating from the return of income filed by the assessee. The major issues involved in this case

M/S NARULA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

144 of the Act by the then AO as the assessee remained non-cooperative throughout the assessment proceedings. The I.T.A. Nos. 22/Asr/2020 19 &33 Others assessment was completed by the then AO after examining the appraisal report along with seized documents/material and issues emanating from the return of income filed by the assessee. The major issues involved in this case

M/S NARULA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

144 of the Act by the then AO as the assessee remained non-cooperative throughout the assessment proceedings. The I.T.A. Nos. 22/Asr/2020 19 &33 Others assessment was completed by the then AO after examining the appraisal report along with seized documents/material and issues emanating from the return of income filed by the assessee. The major issues involved in this case