BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

63 results for “reassessment”+ Unexplained Moneyclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,391Mumbai1,345Chennai452Ahmedabad421Kolkata417Jaipur402Bangalore296Hyderabad252Pune166Chandigarh141Indore135Rajkot126Visakhapatnam107Surat83Guwahati65Nagpur64Amritsar63Raipur58Patna57Agra50Cochin44Lucknow37Jodhpur25Allahabad21Cuttack21Dehradun11Ranchi7Telangana4Varanasi3Panaji3Orissa2SC2Gauhati1Rajasthan1Punjab & Haryana1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 14863Addition to Income61Section 153A57Section 6834Section 143(3)34Section 69A32Section 14731Section 25027Reassessment22Undisclosed Income

SMT. GURJEET KAUR,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- IV (2),, JALANDHAR

The appeal of the assessee is allowed in terms of our

ITA 628/ASR/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar21 Feb 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Sh. Ravish Sood & Dr. M. L. Meena

For Appellant: Sh. Surinder Mahajan, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Sunil Gautam, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 69Section 91

unexplained money received u/s 69 of the Act. 3. That on the facts and circumstances of the case, addition of Rs. 1,50,00,000/- made by Ld. Assessing Officer confirmed by Learned CIT(A) is illegal and bad in law since: a) Certifiedof agreement alleged to have been executed by the assessee in favour of some Surjit Singh

Showing 1–20 of 63 · Page 1 of 4

21
Section 250(6)17
Cash Deposit17

SMT. GURJEET KAUR,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- IV (2),, JALANDHAR

The appeal of the assessee is allowed in terms of our

ITA 627/ASR/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar21 Feb 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Sh. Ravish Sood & Dr. M. L. Meena

For Appellant: Sh. Surinder Mahajan, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Sunil Gautam, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 69Section 91

unexplained money received u/s 69 of the Act. 3. That on the facts and circumstances of the case, addition of Rs. 1,50,00,000/- made by Ld. Assessing Officer confirmed by Learned CIT(A) is illegal and bad in law since: a) Certifiedof agreement alleged to have been executed by the assessee in favour of some Surjit Singh

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. ANKUR MARWAHA, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 390/ASR/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT-DR
Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

money u/s 69A of the Act in the absence of plausible explanation by the assessee without going into the merit of the case? 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend modify, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal.” 4. During appeal proceedings

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. ANKUSH MARWAHA, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 385/ASR/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT-DR
Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

money u/s 69A of the Act in the absence of plausible explanation by the assessee without going into the merit of the case? 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend modify, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal.” 4. During appeal proceedings

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. RAJNI MARWAHA, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 250/ASR/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT-DR
Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

money u/s 69A of the Act in the absence of plausible explanation by the assessee without going into the merit of the case? 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend modify, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal.” 4. During appeal proceedings

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. ANKUSH MARWAHA, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 386/ASR/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT-DR
Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

money u/s 69A of the Act in the absence of plausible explanation by the assessee without going into the merit of the case? 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend modify, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal.” 4. During appeal proceedings

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. ANKUR MARWAHA, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 340/ASR/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT-DR
Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

money u/s 69A of the Act in the absence of plausible explanation by the assessee without going into the merit of the case? 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend modify, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal.” 4. During appeal proceedings

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. ANKUR MARWAHA, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 389/ASR/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT-DR
Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

money u/s 69A of the Act in the absence of plausible explanation by the assessee without going into the merit of the case? 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend modify, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal.” 4. During appeal proceedings

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. ANKUSH MARWAHA, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 388/ASR/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT-DR
Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

money u/s 69A of the Act in the absence of plausible explanation by the assessee without going into the merit of the case? 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend modify, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal.” 4. During appeal proceedings

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. ANKUSH MARWAHA, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 387/ASR/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT-DR
Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

money u/s 69A of the Act in the absence of plausible explanation by the assessee without going into the merit of the case? 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend modify, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal.” 4. During appeal proceedings

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. RAJNI MARWAHA, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 196/ASR/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT-DR
Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

money u/s 69A of the Act in the absence of plausible explanation by the assessee without going into the merit of the case? 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend modify, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal.” 4. During appeal proceedings

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. RAJNI MARWAHA, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 251/ASR/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT-DR
Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

money u/s 69A of the Act in the absence of plausible explanation by the assessee without going into the merit of the case? 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend modify, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal.” 4. During appeal proceedings

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. ANKUSH MARWAHA, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 392/ASR/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT-DR
Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

money u/s 69A of the Act in the absence of plausible explanation by the assessee without going into the merit of the case? 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend modify, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal.” 4. During appeal proceedings

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. RAJNI MARWAHA, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 249/ASR/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT-DR
Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

money u/s 69A of the Act in the absence of plausible explanation by the assessee without going into the merit of the case? 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend modify, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal.” 4. During appeal proceedings

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR vs. ANKUSH MARWAHA, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 383/ASR/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT-DR
Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

money u/s 69A of the Act in the absence of plausible explanation by the assessee without going into the merit of the case? 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend modify, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal.” 4. During appeal proceedings

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. ANKUR MARWAHA, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 265/ASR/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT-DR
Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

money u/s 69A of the Act in the absence of plausible explanation by the assessee without going into the merit of the case? 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend modify, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal.” 4. During appeal proceedings

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. ANKUSH MARWAHA, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 391/ASR/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT-DR
Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

money u/s 69A of the Act in the absence of plausible explanation by the assessee without going into the merit of the case? 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend modify, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal.” 4. During appeal proceedings

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. ANKUR MARWAHA, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 266/ASR/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT-DR
Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

money u/s 69A of the Act in the absence of plausible explanation by the assessee without going into the merit of the case? 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend modify, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal.” 4. During appeal proceedings

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. ANKUR MARWAHA, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 337/ASR/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT-DR
Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

money u/s 69A of the Act in the absence of plausible explanation by the assessee without going into the merit of the case? 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend modify, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal.” 4. During appeal proceedings

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXQ, JALANDHAR vs. ANKUSH MARWAHA, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 384/ASR/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT-DR
Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

money u/s 69A of the Act in the absence of plausible explanation by the assessee without going into the merit of the case? 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend modify, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal.” 4. During appeal proceedings