DIVAY MOHINDRU,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, JALANDHAR
The appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 129/ASR/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar08 Jan 2026AY 2017-18
Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta(Hybrid Hearing) I.T.A. No. 129/Asr/2025 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Divay Mohindru, Prop. M/S Vs. Ito, Ward 3(1), Mahavir Abhushans, Deep Jalandhar. Market Juakhana Bazar Kalan, Jalandhar. [Pan:-Advpm1552D] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Sh. Asharay Sarna, Ca. Sh. Charan Dass, Sr. Dr Respondent By Date Of Hearing 14.10.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 08.01.2026
Section 115BSection 143Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 250Section 69A
57 to 92, and the AO has not brought any evidence to the contrary to disprove the said purchase, the payments of which has all been made through bank channel duly reflected in bank statements.
6.5
He further drew our attention to page nos. 93 to 101 of the paper book to submit that the sales affected by the assessee