BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment”+ Section 546clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi155Chennai87Mumbai73Kolkata37Bangalore24Jaipur20Ahmedabad16Pune15Raipur8Chandigarh8Cochin8Cuttack8Visakhapatnam7Hyderabad7Indore7Patna6Telangana5Amritsar4Jodhpur4Lucknow3Surat3Rajkot2Karnataka1SC1

Key Topics

Section 14813Section 54B9Section 1516Addition to Income4Section 5463Deduction3Reopening of Assessment3

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, FARIDKOT, BSNL BUILDING vs. M/S VOHRA SOLVEX PVT. LTD, SADIQ ROAD

In the result, C.O. filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 588/ASR/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar29 Apr 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Udayan Dasgupta & Sh. Krinwant Sahay

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, A.R
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 250(6)Section 69C

reassessment proceeding due to the absence of any purchase agreements and details of transportation in respect of the said purchases and as such the same has remained unexplained and addition has been made of the entire amount of purchase totaling Rs.6,43,54,912/-, u/s 69C of the Act to the total income of the assessee as bogus purchase

SHRI NACHHATER SINGH S/O SHRI GURBAKSH SINGH,BATHINDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICEER , BATHINDA

In the result all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 164/ASR/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar20 Jul 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. Laliet Kumar & Dr. M. L. Meena

Section 148Section 151Section 546Section 54B

546 of the Act as the payments were made through cheques from the bank account of the assessee even though the sale deed was registered at less value but the fact remain that the assessee purchased the agricultural land in higher cost. CONCISE GROUNDS OF APPEAL in 1. That the Ld. PCIT has erred in confirming the action

SHRI.BOOTA SINGH S/O. SH. NACHATER SINGH, BATHINDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2(1), BATHINDA

In the result all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 162/ASR/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar20 Jul 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. Laliet Kumar & Dr. M. L. Meena

Section 148Section 151Section 546Section 54B

546 of the Act as the payments were made through cheques from the bank account of the assessee even though the sale deed was registered at less value but the fact remain that the assessee purchased the agricultural land in higher cost. CONCISE GROUNDS OF APPEAL in 1. That the Ld. PCIT has erred in confirming the action

SHRI BABBU SINGH S/O SHRI NACHHATER SINGH,BATHINDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICEER WARD-2(1), BATHINDA

In the result all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 163/ASR/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar20 Jul 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. Laliet Kumar & Dr. M. L. Meena

Section 148Section 151Section 546Section 54B

546 of the Act as the payments were made through cheques from the bank account of the assessee even though the sale deed was registered at less value but the fact remain that the assessee purchased the agricultural land in higher cost. CONCISE GROUNDS OF APPEAL in 1. That the Ld. PCIT has erred in confirming the action