BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

342 results for “reassessment”+ Section 4(5)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi6,233Mumbai5,740Chennai1,797Kolkata1,479Bangalore1,444Ahmedabad1,178Jaipur1,043Hyderabad806Pune755Raipur510Chandigarh503Surat430Indore383Amritsar342Visakhapatnam327Rajkot303Cochin301Cuttack266Karnataka214Agra178Patna176Nagpur169Guwahati149Lucknow132Ranchi124Dehradun111Telangana99Jodhpur81Allahabad65SC48Panaji42Calcutta40Jabalpur34Kerala17Orissa16Varanasi15Rajasthan12Punjab & Haryana4Gauhati3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Himachal Pradesh2K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Uttarakhand1Madhya Pradesh1J&K1

Key Topics

Section 148119Addition to Income92Section 153A83Section 14769Section 14463Section 26356Section 25050Section 250(6)35Reassessment33Natural Justice

SHRI HARSH VARDHAN ,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR

ITA 308/ASR/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar21 Feb 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Sh. Ravish Sood & Dr. M. L. Meena

For Appellant: Sh. Nirmal Mahajan, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Trilochan Singh PS Khalsa, DR
Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148

5) of sub-section (1) of section 282— (i) the address available in the PAN database of the addressee; or (ii) the address available in the income-tax return to which the communication relates; or (iii) the address available in the last income-tax return furnished by the addressee; or (iv) in the case of addressee being a company, address

M/S CITI PLAZA,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , WARD 3(1), JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

Showing 1–20 of 342 · Page 1 of 18

...
31
Section 143(3)30
Disallowance28
ITA 356/ASR/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar13 Sept 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 147Section 148Section 250

reassessment or re-computation "in consequence of or to give effect to any finding or direction contained in order under section 250". In this way, this section also presumes that there is a power with the ld. CIT(A) to give direction to the ld. AO even in an order u/s 250. 6.1. Powers of the CIT (A) Section

D.CI.T , CENTRAL CIRCLE - II, JALANDHAR vs. SH. SUBASH GANDHI , JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 408/ASR/2017[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar21 Feb 2018AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri N.K. Choudhry

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri S.S. Negi
Section 115VSection 127Section 132Section 143Section 144Section 144BSection 200ASection 206CSection 246A

4. We have heard the Ld. DR and perused the relevant material on record. There is no appearance from the side of the assessee despite notice. No plausible reasons have been given in the request for adjournment, which has been rejected. It is observed that the Ld. CIT(A) has quashed the assessment on the ground that no valid order

D.CI.T , CENTRAL CIRCLE - II, JALANDHAR vs. SH. SUBASH GANDHI , JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 410/ASR/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar21 Feb 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri N.K. Choudhry

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri S.S. Negi
Section 115VSection 127Section 132Section 143Section 144Section 144BSection 200ASection 206CSection 246A

4. We have heard the Ld. DR and perused the relevant material on record. There is no appearance from the side of the assessee despite notice. No plausible reasons have been given in the request for adjournment, which has been rejected. It is observed that the Ld. CIT(A) has quashed the assessment on the ground that no valid order

D.CI.T , CENTRAL CIRCLE - II, JALANDHAR vs. SH. SUBASH GANDHI , JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 412/ASR/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar21 Feb 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri N.K. Choudhry

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri S.S. Negi
Section 115VSection 127Section 132Section 143Section 144Section 144BSection 200ASection 206CSection 246A

4. We have heard the Ld. DR and perused the relevant material on record. There is no appearance from the side of the assessee despite notice. No plausible reasons have been given in the request for adjournment, which has been rejected. It is observed that the Ld. CIT(A) has quashed the assessment on the ground that no valid order

SHRI BALJINDER SINGH ,BATHINDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1), BATHINDA

In the result, both the appeals are disposed off in the terms indicated as above

ITA 148/ASR/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Aug 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. J. K. Gupta, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. S. M. Surendranath, Sr. DR
Section 148Section 69A

4 and 5 are dismissed. 7.0 Ground of Appeal no. 6: This ground of appeal is related to legality of directions issued by the joint Commissioner invoking section 144A of the Income Tax Act. However, neither in the assessment order nor in any of the written submissions filed by the appellant this issue has been pressed upon, therefore the same

SHRIMATI MANJIT KAUR,BATHINDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2 (1), BATHINDA

In the result, both the appeals are disposed off in the terms indicated as above

ITA 147/ASR/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Aug 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. J. K. Gupta, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. S. M. Surendranath, Sr. DR
Section 148Section 69A

4 and 5 are dismissed. 7.0 Ground of Appeal no. 6: This ground of appeal is related to legality of directions issued by the joint Commissioner invoking section 144A of the Income Tax Act. However, neither in the assessment order nor in any of the written submissions filed by the appellant this issue has been pressed upon, therefore the same

M/S SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA Nos

ITA 19/ASR/2017[1988-89]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar20 Dec 2022AY 1988-89

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 153(4)

5. We heard the rival submission relied on the documents available in the record. First, we consider the additional ground placed by the ld. counsel before the bench. The additional ground is accepted and taken for adjudication. The ld. Sr. DR had not made any objection for acceptance of the additional ground before the bench. The section 153(4

M/S SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA Nos

ITA 15/ASR/2017[1984-85]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar20 Dec 2022AY 1984-85

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 153(4)

5. We heard the rival submission relied on the documents available in the record. First, we consider the additional ground placed by the ld. counsel before the bench. The additional ground is accepted and taken for adjudication. The ld. Sr. DR had not made any objection for acceptance of the additional ground before the bench. The section 153(4

M/S SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA Nos

ITA 16/ASR/2017[1985-86]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar20 Dec 2022AY 1985-86

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 153(4)

5. We heard the rival submission relied on the documents available in the record. First, we consider the additional ground placed by the ld. counsel before the bench. The additional ground is accepted and taken for adjudication. The ld. Sr. DR had not made any objection for acceptance of the additional ground before the bench. The section 153(4

M/S SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA Nos

ITA 21/ASR/2017[1990-91]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar20 Dec 2022AY 1990-91

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 153(4)

5. We heard the rival submission relied on the documents available in the record. First, we consider the additional ground placed by the ld. counsel before the bench. The additional ground is accepted and taken for adjudication. The ld. Sr. DR had not made any objection for acceptance of the additional ground before the bench. The section 153(4

M/S SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA Nos

ITA 22/ASR/2017[1991-92]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar20 Dec 2022AY 1991-92

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 153(4)

5. We heard the rival submission relied on the documents available in the record. First, we consider the additional ground placed by the ld. counsel before the bench. The additional ground is accepted and taken for adjudication. The ld. Sr. DR had not made any objection for acceptance of the additional ground before the bench. The section 153(4

M/S SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA Nos

ITA 17/ASR/2017[1986-87]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar20 Dec 2022AY 1986-87

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 153(4)

5. We heard the rival submission relied on the documents available in the record. First, we consider the additional ground placed by the ld. counsel before the bench. The additional ground is accepted and taken for adjudication. The ld. Sr. DR had not made any objection for acceptance of the additional ground before the bench. The section 153(4

M/S SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA Nos

ITA 18/ASR/2017[1987-88]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar20 Dec 2022AY 1987-88

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 153(4)

5. We heard the rival submission relied on the documents available in the record. First, we consider the additional ground placed by the ld. counsel before the bench. The additional ground is accepted and taken for adjudication. The ld. Sr. DR had not made any objection for acceptance of the additional ground before the bench. The section 153(4

M/S KASHMIR STEEL ROLLING MILLS,JAMMU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAMMU

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is partly allowed

ITA 548/ASR/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 May 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi.T.A. No. 548/(Asr)/2016 Assessment Year: 2009-10

For Appellant: Sh. Tarun Bansal (Adv.)For Respondent: Sh. Charan Dass (D.R.)
Section 143(3)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

4 to section 271(1)(c) by reckoning the tax rebate as applicable to a section 80G donation. We decide accordingly. The third and final disallowance qua which the penalty stands levied is in respect of depreciation allowance claimed on a scooter. The assessee’s case that it is the beneficial owner thereof is wholly unsubstantiated. It is not even

SAINIK CO OPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LIMITED,JAMMU AND KASHMIR vs. ITO WARD 1(1), JAMMU, JAMMU

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed on the legal issue as indicated above

ITA 698/ASR/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar08 Sept 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta(Hybrid Hearing) I.T.A. No. 698/Asr/2024 Assessment Year: 2013-14

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 69A

4-5-2022 in Union of India v. Ashish Agarwal [2022] 138 taxmann.com 64/286 Taxman 183/444 ITR 1 and period from date of said decision till date of providing material, as required to be accompanied with a notice under section 148A(b), was required to be excluded by virtue of third proviso to section 149(1) - Further, time granted

SHRIMATI AMARJIT KAUR W/O BUGAR SINGH,MANSA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(4), MANSA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1/ASR/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar26 Jul 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. S. M. Surendranath, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 148Section 251(2)Section 49

4. The facts of the case as per record are that in the reassessment proceedings, the statutory notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act was issued on 22 March 2016 which was received back with postal comments refused. Subsequently the official of the department was sent on 14 April 2016 for service of notice which was received

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR vs. M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 58/ASR/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

reassess takinginto consideration the other material in respect ofcompleted assessments/unabated assessments.Meaning thereby, in respect of completed/unabatedassessments, no addition can be made by the AO inabsence of any incriminating material found during thecourse of search under Section 132 or requisition underSection 132A of the Act, 1961. However, thecompleted/unabated assessments can be re-opened bythe AO in exercise of powers under Sections

MEASAGE SAT KARTAR SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 25/ASR/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

reassess takinginto consideration the other material in respect ofcompleted assessments/unabated assessments.Meaning thereby, in respect of completed/unabatedassessments, no addition can be made by the AO inabsence of any incriminating material found during thecourse of search under Section 132 or requisition underSection 132A of the Act, 1961. However, thecompleted/unabated assessments can be re-opened bythe AO in exercise of powers under Sections

M/S NARULA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 79/ASR/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

reassess takinginto consideration the other material in respect ofcompleted assessments/unabated assessments.Meaning thereby, in respect of completed/unabatedassessments, no addition can be made by the AO inabsence of any incriminating material found during thecourse of search under Section 132 or requisition underSection 132A of the Act, 1961. However, thecompleted/unabated assessments can be re-opened bythe AO in exercise of powers under Sections