BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

147 results for “reassessment”+ Section 36clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,181Mumbai2,033Chennai680Bangalore585Jaipur536Ahmedabad396Hyderabad379Kolkata304Chandigarh213Pune202Indore172Amritsar147Surat139Visakhapatnam116Raipur114Rajkot96Cochin71Cuttack68Nagpur68Karnataka65Guwahati65Telangana52Patna51Lucknow50Jodhpur39Agra38Allahabad38Ranchi34Dehradun32SC23Panaji19Jabalpur11Orissa10Calcutta8Rajasthan4Varanasi4Kerala3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Uttarakhand1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 147111Section 14894Addition to Income91Section 14467Section 25055Section 250(6)54Section 69A48Section 153A39Disallowance33Natural Justice

SHRI HARSH VARDHAN ,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR

ITA 308/ASR/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar21 Feb 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Sh. Ravish Sood & Dr. M. L. Meena

For Appellant: Sh. Nirmal Mahajan, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Trilochan Singh PS Khalsa, DR
Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148

reassessment proceedings. Apropos the objections filed by the assessee in the course of the assessment proceedings, it was submitted by him that the A.O had failed to dispose off the same by way of a speaking order. Also, it was the claim of the assessee that the impugned assessment order, i.e, u/s 148 r.w.s 143(3), dated 30.03.2016 was passed

SAINIK CO OPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LIMITED,JAMMU AND KASHMIR vs. ITO WARD 1(1), JAMMU, JAMMU

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed on the legal issue as indicated above

Showing 1–20 of 147 · Page 1 of 8

...
32
Depreciation30
Reassessment25
ITA 698/ASR/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar08 Sept 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta(Hybrid Hearing) I.T.A. No. 698/Asr/2024 Assessment Year: 2013-14

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 69A

reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 148 as being void ab initio. 8.1) Relying on the above judgments he prays that in the instant case, the notice issued u/s 148 dated 25.07.2022 is barred by limitation and since the notice itself is void ab initio the entire proceedings are to be cancelled. Before concluding the ld AR however, has withdrawn

MEASAGE SAT KARTAR SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 25/ASR/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

36 &33 Others a case where theundisclosed income is found on the basis of incriminatingmaterial, the AO would assume the jurisdiction to assessor reassess the total income for the entire six years blockassessment period even in case of completed/unabatedassessment. As per the second proviso to Section

MEASAGE SAT KARTAR SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 27/ASR/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

36 &33 Others a case where theundisclosed income is found on the basis of incriminatingmaterial, the AO would assume the jurisdiction to assessor reassess the total income for the entire six years blockassessment period even in case of completed/unabatedassessment. As per the second proviso to Section

MEASAGE NARULA SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED,MOGA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE , AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 33/ASR/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

36 &33 Others a case where theundisclosed income is found on the basis of incriminatingmaterial, the AO would assume the jurisdiction to assessor reassess the total income for the entire six years blockassessment period even in case of completed/unabatedassessment. As per the second proviso to Section

MEASAGE NARULA SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED,MOGA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 34/ASR/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

36 &33 Others a case where theundisclosed income is found on the basis of incriminatingmaterial, the AO would assume the jurisdiction to assessor reassess the total income for the entire six years blockassessment period even in case of completed/unabatedassessment. As per the second proviso to Section

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR vs. M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVTE LIMITED, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 59/ASR/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

36 &33 Others a case where theundisclosed income is found on the basis of incriminatingmaterial, the AO would assume the jurisdiction to assessor reassess the total income for the entire six years blockassessment period even in case of completed/unabatedassessment. As per the second proviso to Section

M/S NARULA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 77/ASR/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

36 &33 Others a case where theundisclosed income is found on the basis of incriminatingmaterial, the AO would assume the jurisdiction to assessor reassess the total income for the entire six years blockassessment period even in case of completed/unabatedassessment. As per the second proviso to Section

M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHEMDABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 63/ASR/2020[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

36 &33 Others a case where theundisclosed income is found on the basis of incriminatingmaterial, the AO would assume the jurisdiction to assessor reassess the total income for the entire six years blockassessment period even in case of completed/unabatedassessment. As per the second proviso to Section

M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHEMDABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 64/ASR/2020[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

36 &33 Others a case where theundisclosed income is found on the basis of incriminatingmaterial, the AO would assume the jurisdiction to assessor reassess the total income for the entire six years blockassessment period even in case of completed/unabatedassessment. As per the second proviso to Section

M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHEMDABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 65/ASR/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

36 &33 Others a case where theundisclosed income is found on the basis of incriminatingmaterial, the AO would assume the jurisdiction to assessor reassess the total income for the entire six years blockassessment period even in case of completed/unabatedassessment. As per the second proviso to Section

M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHEMDABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 66/ASR/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

36 &33 Others a case where theundisclosed income is found on the basis of incriminatingmaterial, the AO would assume the jurisdiction to assessor reassess the total income for the entire six years blockassessment period even in case of completed/unabatedassessment. As per the second proviso to Section

M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHEMDABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 67/ASR/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

36 &33 Others a case where theundisclosed income is found on the basis of incriminatingmaterial, the AO would assume the jurisdiction to assessor reassess the total income for the entire six years blockassessment period even in case of completed/unabatedassessment. As per the second proviso to Section

M/S NARULA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 75/ASR/2020[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

36 &33 Others a case where theundisclosed income is found on the basis of incriminatingmaterial, the AO would assume the jurisdiction to assessor reassess the total income for the entire six years blockassessment period even in case of completed/unabatedassessment. As per the second proviso to Section

M/S NARULA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 76/ASR/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

36 &33 Others a case where theundisclosed income is found on the basis of incriminatingmaterial, the AO would assume the jurisdiction to assessor reassess the total income for the entire six years blockassessment period even in case of completed/unabatedassessment. As per the second proviso to Section

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR vs. M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 58/ASR/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

36 &33 Others a case where theundisclosed income is found on the basis of incriminatingmaterial, the AO would assume the jurisdiction to assessor reassess the total income for the entire six years blockassessment period even in case of completed/unabatedassessment. As per the second proviso to Section

M/S NARULA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 78/ASR/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

36 &33 Others a case where theundisclosed income is found on the basis of incriminatingmaterial, the AO would assume the jurisdiction to assessor reassess the total income for the entire six years blockassessment period even in case of completed/unabatedassessment. As per the second proviso to Section

M/S NARULA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 79/ASR/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

36 &33 Others a case where theundisclosed income is found on the basis of incriminatingmaterial, the AO would assume the jurisdiction to assessor reassess the total income for the entire six years blockassessment period even in case of completed/unabatedassessment. As per the second proviso to Section

M/S NARULA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 80/ASR/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

36 &33 Others a case where theundisclosed income is found on the basis of incriminatingmaterial, the AO would assume the jurisdiction to assessor reassess the total income for the entire six years blockassessment period even in case of completed/unabatedassessment. As per the second proviso to Section

MEASAGE SAT KARTAR SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 26/ASR/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

36 &33 Others a case where theundisclosed income is found on the basis of incriminatingmaterial, the AO would assume the jurisdiction to assessor reassess the total income for the entire six years blockassessment period even in case of completed/unabatedassessment. As per the second proviso to Section