Search: reassessment

7 results for “reassessment”+ Section 273Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai23 Cochin18 Jaipur11 Bangalore10 Chennai10 Delhi10 Surat9 Amritsar7 Ahmedabad6 Indore6 Cuttack5 Jabalpur4 Hyderabad3 Kolkata2 Ranchi1 Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)30 Section 153A20 Section 26316 Section 13910 Section 271D8 Penalty7 Section 269S6 Section 1485 Section 273B5 House Property

SH. MANJIT KRISHAN MALHOTRA,ABOHAR vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCME TAX , BATHINDA

The appeals of the assessee are disposed of in the terms indicated as above

ITA 39/ASR/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Aug 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Anil Puri, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Chandrajit Singh, CIT DR

Section 263Section 269SSection 271D

Sections 143(3), 147, 273B Case pertains to Asst. Year1961-62, 1962-63, 1963-64, 1964-65 Decision in favour of: Assessee SUHAS CHANDRA SEN J 24. It was ultimately held by Chandurkar J. that : "The words 'regular assessment' which were to be found in sub-s. (9) of s. 18A of the Indian IT Act, 1922, have, no doubt

SH. MANJIT KRISHAN MALHOTRA,ABOHAR vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCME TAX , BATHINDA

SHRI. MANJIT KRISHAN MALHOTRA,ABOHAR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BATHINDA

SH. MANJIT KRISHAN MALHOTRA,ABOHAR vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCME TAX , BATHINDA

SHRI. MANJIT KRISHAN MALHOTRA,ABOHAR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BATHINDA

HIMANI GOYAL SHARMA,JAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, BATHINDA

HIMANI GOYAL SHARMA,JAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, BATHINDA

HIMANI GOYAL SHARMA,JAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, BATHINDA

HIMANI GOYA SHARMA,JAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, BATHINDA

HIMANI GOYAL SHARMA,JAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, BATHINDA