BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment”+ Section 269Tclear

Sorted by relevance

Pune18Jaipur15Delhi12Mumbai12Indore7Ahmedabad5Surat3Bangalore3Kolkata3Lucknow3Amritsar2Patna1

Key Topics

Section 26316Section 271D8Section 269S6Penalty2Condonation of Delay2

SH. MANJIT KRISHAN MALHOTRA,ABOHAR vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCME TAX , BATHINDA

The appeals of the assessee are disposed of in the terms indicated as above

ITA 39/ASR/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Aug 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Anil Puri, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Chandrajit Singh, CIT DR
Section 263Section 269SSection 271D

269T of the Act. Accordingly, he held that the JCIT, Bathinda although initiated the penalty proceedings but dropped the penalty proceedings without assigning any reasons by exercising statutory powers in judicious manner in Manjit Krishan Malhotra v. Pr.CIT accordance with the provisions of law and held that such an order was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue

SHRI. MANJIT KRISHAN MALHOTRA,ABOHAR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BATHINDA

The appeals of the assessee are disposed of in the terms indicated as above

ITA 40/ASR/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Aug 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Anil Puri, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Chandrajit Singh, CIT DR
Section 263Section 269SSection 271D

269T of the Act. Accordingly, he held that the JCIT, Bathinda although initiated the penalty proceedings but dropped the penalty proceedings without assigning any reasons by exercising statutory powers in judicious manner in Manjit Krishan Malhotra v. Pr.CIT accordance with the provisions of law and held that such an order was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue